Why Does 802.11a Struggle with Penetration Compared to 802.11g?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jastewart
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frequency
Click For Summary
The discussion highlights the differences in signal penetration and range between 802.11a and 802.11g due to their operating frequencies. The 802.11g standard operates at 2.4GHz, which allows for better penetration through obstacles and less signal attenuation compared to the 5GHz frequency used by 802.11a. As frequency increases, the ability of the signal to penetrate objects decreases, which is a key factor in the performance differences between these two Wi-Fi standards. An analogy is drawn to visible light, which, despite being a form of electromagnetic radiation like Wi-Fi, cannot penetrate even thin paper due to its high frequency. Overall, the 2.4GHz band of 802.11g provides greater range and better penetration than the 5GHz band of 802.11a.
jastewart
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I am looking into why 802.11a does not permeate as well as 802.11g. I know that they are different freq. Does this mean a different cell size per packet as well?
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
Almost all of the extra range comes from the different frequencies, the 2.4GHz band that 802.11g operates in attenuates significantly less than the 5GHz band that 802.11a operates in. As frequency increases (wavelength decreases) the ability to penetrate objects goes down (generally, some exceptions).

As an extreme example, visible light is the same stuff as wifi signals (EM radiation), yet is unable to penetrate even thin paper due to its extremely high frequency.
 
RFMatt said:
Almost all of the extra range comes from the different frequencies, the 2.4GHz band that 802.11g operates in attenuates significantly less than the 5GHz band that 802.11a operates in. As frequency increases (wavelength decreases) the ability to penetrate objects goes down (generally, some exceptions).

As an extreme example, visible light is the same stuff as wifi signals (EM radiation), yet is unable to penetrate even thin paper due to its extremely high frequency.
Thank you! Excellent!
 
Thread 'ChatGPT Examples, Good and Bad'
I've been experimenting with ChatGPT. Some results are good, some very very bad. I think examples can help expose the properties of this AI. Maybe you can post some of your favorite examples and tell us what they reveal about the properties of this AI. (I had problems with copy/paste of text and formatting, so I'm posting my examples as screen shots. That is a promising start. :smile: But then I provided values V=1, R1=1, R2=2, R3=3 and asked for the value of I. At first, it said...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
824
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K