Exploring Efficient Weapons in Sci-Fi Settings

  • Thread starter Thread starter essenmein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sci-fi
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the efficiency and practicality of various weapon types in science fiction settings, particularly focusing on anti-gravity (AG) weapons and antimatter (AM) weapons. Participants explore the implications of these technologies on warfare, including their energy efficiency, destructive potential, and logistical considerations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that mass throwers, utilizing anti-gravity, could be effective weapons, but question their efficiency compared to antimatter weapons, which theoretically provide greater destructive force per unit of input energy.
  • Others argue that the ability to stockpile ammunition is a significant factor in weapon choice, suggesting that chemical-based weapons may require less peak power and be easier to manage than energy-based systems like railguns.
  • A later reply emphasizes that antimatter weapons could also involve throwing mass, potentially allowing for lower energy requirements during launch compared to traditional mass throwers.
  • Concerns are raised about the limitations of achieving near-light speeds and the implications of kinetic energy exceeding rest mass energy, suggesting that such scenarios complicate the discussion of weapon effectiveness.
  • Some participants note that the prevalence of anti-gravity devices in science fiction may stem from artistic choices rather than realistic weapon design, as depicting free-fall can be challenging in visual media.
  • There is a discussion about the tactical implications of anti-gravity technology, including its potential to act as a shield against incoming projectiles, raising questions about its effectiveness as a weapon.
  • Participants express a desire for a more thorough exploration of the implications of these technologies in warfare, rather than accepting them at face value.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the effectiveness of anti-gravity versus antimatter weapons, with multiple competing views on their efficiency, practicality, and implications for warfare remaining unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about the efficiency of energy conversion processes, the feasibility of achieving certain velocities, and the tactical effectiveness of proposed weapon systems. The discussion also highlights the challenge of reconciling artistic representation with scientific plausibility in weapon design.

  • #61
GTOM said:
Recon part: with advanced recon probes, you can pretty much decrease the beam scattering problem.
Sensor picket methodology. Well, it is not a very efficient protection. Because volley aimed at main ship can take out sensor pickets too. And pickets itself to be efficient must be outside of point defense range of mothership, therefore vulnerable to wider range of threats.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
With regard to the sensor topic and ships reaching relativistic speeds to be able to launch piles of rocks at people. If you can fly at those velocities, you'd better hope you have good sensor tech, because a stationary rock/rubble shield would be just as effective against you as the weapon you plan on wielding.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: trurle

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
12K
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K