Exploring Infinitesimal Rotations in Classical Mechanics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the transformation of coordinates under infinitesimal rotations as presented in Goldstein's Classical Mechanics, specifically in the context of rigid body motion. Participants are exploring the mathematical formulation and implications of rotation matrices in this scenario.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants seek clarification on the transformation of coordinates under infinitesimal rotation as described in a specific equation from Goldstein's text.
  • One participant suggests writing out the rotation matrix for a small angle and applying approximations for sine and cosine to derive the limit for infinitesimal rotation.
  • Another participant proposes that applying trigonometric limits directly into the rotation matrix would yield a more general form, leading to a specific equation.
  • Several participants agree on the analysis of infinitesimal rotations about the three coordinate axes, noting that these have a well-known simple form.
  • There is a mention of deriving the infinitesimal rotation matrix from a general rotation matrix defined by Euler angles, with some participants expressing uncertainty about the author's intent in the text.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the approach to analyzing infinitesimal rotations and the use of rotation matrices, but there are differing interpretations of Goldstein's presentation and the implications of the equations involved. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific application and understanding of the equations referenced.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the details in Goldstein's text, indicating a potential lack of clarity in the original material. There are also unresolved aspects regarding the application of trigonometric limits and the derivation of the rotation matrix.

Kashmir
Messages
466
Reaction score
74
1636813415640.png


Can anybody please help me to understand that why under infinitesimal rotation ##x1## transforms in the way as shown in equation 4-100?

This is from Goldstein's Classical Mechanics page chapter 5 and page 168 on the Kinematics of Rigid body motion.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Kashmir said:
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/292210

Can anybody please help me to understand that why under infinitesimal rotation ##x'_1## transforms in the way as shown ?

This is from Goldstein's Classical Mechanics page chapter 5 and page 168 on the Kinematics of Rigid body motion.
That link doesn't work.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kashmir
PeroK said:
That link doesn't work.
Thank you. Edited.
 
The way I would do it is to write out the rotation matrix for a rotation of ##\theta## about the ##x_1## axis. And apply this matrix to an arbitrary vector ##(x_1, x_2,x_3)##.

When ##\theta## is small, we have ##\cos \theta \approx 1##, ##\sin \theta \approx \theta##. If you apply those approximations you should get the limit for an infinitesimal rotation.

I think Goldstein is just using generic matric entries, rather than ##\cos \theta## and ##\sin \theta## explicity.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kashmir
Wouldn't it be more general to apply these trigonometric limits for small angles directly into the rotation matrix here ##A=\left[\begin{array}{ccc}\cos \psi \cos \phi-\cos \theta \sin \phi \sin \psi & \cos \psi \sin \phi+\cos \theta \cos \phi \sin \psi & \sin \psi \sin \theta \\ -\sin \psi \cos \phi-\cos \theta \sin \phi \cos \psi & -\sin \psi \sin \phi+\cos \theta \cos \phi \cos \psi & \cos \psi \cdot \sin \theta \\ \sin \theta \sin \phi & -\sin \theta \cos \phi & \cos \theta\end{array}\right]## reducing to ##A=\left[\begin{array}{ccc}1-\phi \psi & \phi+\psi & \psi \theta \\ -\psi-\phi & -\psi \phi+1 & \theta \\\theta \phi & -\theta & 1\end{array}\right]## hence the required equation A-400 ?
 
Kashmir said:
Yes I got the idea. Thank you. Wouldn't it be more general to apply these trigonometric limits for small angles directly into the rotation matrix here ##A=\left[\begin{array}{ccc}\cos \psi \cos \phi-\cos \theta \sin \phi \sin \psi & \cos \psi \sin \phi+\cos \theta \cos \phi \sin \psi & \sin \psi \sin \theta \\ -\sin \psi \cos \phi-\cos \theta \sin \phi \cos \psi & -\sin \psi \sin \phi+\cos \theta \cos \phi \cos \psi & \cos \psi \cdot \sin \theta \\ \sin \theta \sin \phi & -\sin \theta \cos \phi & \cos \theta\end{array}\right]## reducing to ##A=\left[\begin{array}{ccc}1-\phi \psi & \phi+\psi & \phi \theta \\ 4 \beta-\phi & -\psi \phi+1 & \theta \\ -\psi & -\theta & 1\end{array}\right## hence the required equation A-400 ?
We simply want to analyse infinitesimal rotations about the three coordinate axes. Those have a well-known simple form.
 
PeroK said:
We simply want to analyse infinitesimal rotations about the three coordinate axes. Those have a well-known simple form.
I agree. We can also think like this:
Given a general rotation matrix A defined with the three Euler angles phi, theta and psi we can find the limit by letting all three go to zero and find that the infinitesimal rotation is
##A=\left[\begin{array}{ccc}1-\phi \psi & \phi+\psi & \psi \theta \\ -\psi-\phi & -\psi \phi+1 & \theta \\\theta \phi & -\theta & 1\end{array}\right] =I+e## exactly as the author writes at equation A-102 .
 
Kashmir said:
I agree. We can also think like this:
Given a general rotation matrix A defined with the three Euler angles phi, theta and psi we can find the limit by letting all three go to zero and find that the infinitesimal rotation is
##A=\left[\begin{array}{ccc}1-\phi \psi & \phi+\psi & \psi \theta \\ -\psi-\phi & -\psi \phi+1 & \theta \\\theta \phi & -\theta & 1\end{array}\right] =I+e## exactly as the author writes at equation A-102 .
Possibly. I don't have Goldstein, so I don't know where he's going with this. I might have misunderstood what he's trying to do.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kashmir
PeroK said:
Possibly. I don't have Goldstein, so I don't know where he's going with this. I might have misunderstood what he's trying to do.
Thank you for your help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K