Satellite mechanics: linear and rotational momentum

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the mechanics of a satellite's linear and rotational momentum when a thruster ejects propellant. Key points include the conservation of linear and angular momentum, with emphasis on how the point of impulse affects the resulting motion. Participants explore the relationship between linear velocity, angular velocity, and moment of inertia, while addressing misconceptions about angular momentum in non-rotating systems. The conversation highlights the complexities of rocket propulsion, particularly how the direction of thrust influences energy transfer and momentum distribution. Ultimately, the nuances of satellite mechanics are underscored, emphasizing the importance of precise calculations in understanding motion dynamics.
  • #31
haruspex said:
If you choose an axis on the line of motion of the mass centre then it does not contribute any angular momentum
it does. A rotary one. Moment of inertia*angular velocity
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
vasya said:
it does. A rotary one. Moment of inertia*angular velocity
No, I wrote that the linear motion would not contribute to the angular momentum about that axis.
Please post the details of your calculation that arrives at 1/3 and 2/3.
 
  • #33
*shudder*. I think I see it. 100 kg m/s of linear momentum and 50 kg m2/s of angular momentum from rotation. He is taking the ratio of two quantities which have different units and pretending that the result is a dimensionless two to one ratio.

Naturally, the linear momentum is also 10,000 kg cm/s of linear momentum and 500,000 kg cm2/s of angular momentum from rotation for an equally defensible one to fifty ratio. "Equally defensible" because neither is at all defensible as a dimensionless ratio.

Two per meter and one per fifty centimeters are both the same ratio. Both have units.
 
Last edited:
  • #34
jbriggs444 said:
*shudder*. I think I see it. 100 kg m/s of linear momentum and 50 kg m2/s of angular momentum from rotation. He is taking the ratio of two quantities which have different units and pretending that the result is a dimensionless two to one ratio.

Naturally, the linear momentum is also 10,000 kg cm/s of linear momentum and 500,000 kg cm2/s of angular momentum from rotation for an equally defensible one to fifty ratio. "Equally defensible" because neither is at all defensible as a dimensionless ratio.

One half per meter and one per fifty centimeters are both the same ratio. Both have units.
Yes, that's probably the blunder. I was thrown by
vasya said:
angular momentum in linear … motion
taking that mean the linear momentum's contribution to angular momentum.
 
  • #35
jbriggs444 said:
An expanding plume of rocket exhaust of unknown mass and velocity that has 100 kg m/s of linear momentum at an offset of 0.5 meters from the craft's center of mass for a total of -50 kg m2/s.
look more closely on first picture in this thread. thruster has offset of 0.25m of y-piersing-through-the-center-of-mass axis
 
  • #36
vasya said:
look more closely on first picture in this thread. thruster has offset of 0.25m of y-piersing-through-the-center-of-mass axis
Thank you. That explains the factor of two discrepancy in our two evaluations for rotation rate.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K