How is the Speed of Light Formula Derived and Why is it Squared?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The speed of light formula, E=mc², was derived by Albert Einstein in his 1905 paper "Does the inertia of a body depend upon its energy content?" The derivation involves analyzing two frames of reference, A and B, where an object emits light in opposite directions, leading to the conclusion that mass and energy are equivalent. The constant c represents the maximum speed of causality, not just the speed of light, and the relationship can be expressed as the invariant norm E² - p²c², where p is momentum. This framework allows for a deeper understanding of mass-energy equivalence beyond light itself.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's 1905 paper "Does the inertia of a body depend upon its energy content?"
  • Familiarity with Lorentz transformations and their derivation.
  • Knowledge of the concept of mass-energy equivalence.
  • Basic grasp of four-vectors in physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Read Einstein's original paper "Does the inertia of a body depend upon its energy content?"
  • Study the derivation of Lorentz transformations without reference to light.
  • Explore the concept of the mass-energy four-vector and its implications.
  • Investigate the maximum speed of causality and its significance in physics.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators, and anyone interested in the foundations of relativity and the implications of mass-energy equivalence.

FeDeX_LaTeX
Science Advisor
Messages
436
Reaction score
13
Hello;

How is this formula derived? And why is the speed of light squared? Is there a reason for that?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
http://www.btinternet.com/~j.doyle/SR/Emc2/Derive.htm

Google is your friend :).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
FAQ: Where does E=mc2 come from?

Einstein found this result in a 1905 paper, titled "Does the inertia of a body depend upon its energy content?" This paper is very short and readable, and is available online. A summary of the argument is as follows. Define a frame of reference A, and let an object O, initially at rest in this frame, emit two flashes of light in opposite directions. Now define another frame of reference B, in motion relative to A along the same axis as the one along which the light was emitted. Then in order to preserve conservation of energy in both frames, we are forced to attribute a different inertial mass to O before and after it emits the light. The interpretation is that mass and energy are equivalent. By giving up a quantity of energy E, the object has reduced its mass by an amount E/c2.

Although Einstein's original derivation happens to involve the speed of light, E=mc2 can be derived without talking about light at all. One can derive the Lorentz transformations using a set of postulates that don't say anything about light (see, e.g., Rindler 1979). The constant c is then interpreted simply as the maximum speed of causality, not necessarily the speed of light. Constructing the mass-energy four-vector of a particle, we find that its norm E2-p2c2 is frame-invariant, and can be interpreted as m2c4, where m is the particle's rest mass. In the case where the particle is at rest, p=0, and we recover E=mc2.

A. Einstein, Annalen der Physik. 18 (1905) 639, available online at http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/

Rindler, Essential Relativity: Special, General, and Cosmological, 1979, p. 51
 
I've written up a derivation that I believe to be pretty concise, without leaving anything out.

go to
www.shadycrypt.com

and click on the "E=mc2" link at the top.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
6K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • · Replies 72 ·
3
Replies
72
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
2K