Exponent Law proof Cant find anywhere?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter tamintl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponent Law Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the formal proof of the exponent law exp(a+b) = exp(a)exp(b). The participants emphasize that the proof's validity depends on the definition of the exponential function. One participant suggests using the limit definition of exp(x) = lim (n→∞) (1 + x/n)ⁿ as a basis for the proof. Additionally, they propose using mathematical induction to demonstrate the relationship between the exponential functions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of exponential functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with limits in calculus
  • Knowledge of mathematical induction
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the limit definition of the exponential function exp(x) = lim (n→∞) (1 + x/n)ⁿ
  • Learn about mathematical induction and its applications in proofs
  • Explore the properties of rational and real exponents
  • Investigate different definitions of the exponential function, including series and differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, educators teaching calculus, and anyone interested in understanding the formal proofs of exponent laws and their applications.

tamintl
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
I have been studying the exponent laws in depth and I cannot find a formal proof on this law:

exp(a+b) = exp(a)exp(b)

Is it formal enough to say the following? (I think not since I give an example with numbers in it)

We define:
a² = a*a.
For example:
a^8 a^7 = a*a*a*a*a*a*a*a a*a*a*a*a*a*a = a^15 = a^8+7

More generally:
a^(c+b) = a^c * a^b = a^(b+c)

Regards as always
Tam
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Proofs of this type depend upon your definition of exp.

I like to take the addition formula as the definition, so the proof is obvious from the definition.

Others define exp with a limit, a series, an inverse of an integral, or a differential equation and prove it by manipulating whatever their definition is.

Your proof can be extended to prove it for all rationals. The extension to reals is done by taking limits
 
lurflurf said:
Proofs of this type depend upon your definition of exp.

I like to take the addition formula as the definition, so the proof is obvious from the definition.

Others define exp with a limit, a series, an inverse of an integral, or a differential equation and prove it by manipulating whatever their definition is.

Your proof can be extended to prove it for all rationals. The extension to reals is done by taking limits

Thanks for your answer.

I'd like to take the proof from this definition: exp(x) = lim (n→∞) (1 + x/n)ⁿ (Limit)

Would you be able to point my in the right direction please?

Regards
Tam
 
The best formal proof would be by induction.
 
Try to show that
exp(a)exp(b)/exp(a+b)=1
starting with
exp(a)exp(b)/exp(a+b)=
lim (n→∞) (1 + a/n)ⁿ lim (n→∞) (1 + b/n)ⁿ /lim (n→∞) (1 + (a+b)/n)ⁿ =
lim (n→∞) [(1 + a/n)(1 + b/n)/(1 + (a+b)/n)]n
and so on
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
9K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
691