MHB Exponential distribution - inequality

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the exponential distribution and the probability statement involving the inequality $$\mathbb{P}\left (\left |X-\frac{1}{\lambda}\right |\leq \lambda \right )\geq \frac{\lambda^4-1}{\lambda^4}$$. The initial calculations confirm that the probability can be expressed in terms of the cumulative distribution function, leading to the conclusion that $$\mathbb{P}\left (\left |X-\frac{1}{\lambda}\right |< \lambda \right )$$ can be derived using Chebyshev's inequality. It is clarified that for continuous distributions, the strict and non-strict inequalities yield the same probability due to the nature of the probability measure. The discussion concludes with a consensus on the correctness of the approach and the application of Chebyshev's inequality.
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

We consider the exponential distribution.

I want to show that $$\mathbb{P}\left (\left |X-\frac{1}{\lambda}\right |\leq \lambda \right )\geq \frac{\lambda^4-1}{\lambda^4}$$

I have shown so far that \begin{align*}\mathbb{P}\left (\left |X-\frac{1}{\lambda}\right |\leq \lambda \right )&=\mathbb{P}\left (\frac{1-\lambda^2}{\lambda} \leq X\leq \frac{1+\lambda^2}{\lambda}\right ) \\ & =F\left (\frac{1+\lambda^2}{\lambda}\right )-F\left (\frac{1-\lambda^2}{\lambda}\right )=e^{-1+\lambda^2}-e^{-1-\lambda^2}\end{align*} Is this correct? How could we continue? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Now I have an other idea. Do we maybe use Chebyshev inequality ?

We have that $$\mathbb{P}\left (\left |X-\frac{1}{\lambda}\right |< \lambda \right )=1-\mathbb{P}\left (\left |X-\frac{1}{\lambda}\right |\geq \lambda \right )\geq 1-\frac{\text{Var}(X)}{\lambda^2}=1-\frac{\frac{1}{\lambda^2}}{\lambda^2}=1-\frac{1}{\lambda^4}=\frac{\lambda^4-1}{\lambda^4}$$

But now we have $$\mathbb{P}\left (\left |X-\frac{1}{\lambda}\right |< \lambda \right )$$ instead of $$\mathbb{P}\left (\left |X-\frac{1}{\lambda}\right |\leq \lambda \right )$$ (Wondering)
 
Well done to think of Chebyshev.

The events
\[
\left\{ \left| X - \frac{1}{\lambda} \right| < \lambda \right\} \qquad \text{and} \quad \left\{ \left| X - \frac{1}{\lambda} \right| \le \lambda \right\}
\]
have the same probability because the underlying probability measure is absolutely continuous (with density equal to the exponential density with parameter $\lambda$), so the difference between strict and non-strict inequality does not matter.
 
Yep. All good.
And note that in general for a continuous distribution $P(X=x)=0$ so that $P(X>x)=P(X\ge x)$. (Thinking)
 
Great! Thank you very much! (Happy)
 
Hello, I'm joining this forum to ask two questions which have nagged me for some time. They both are presumed obvious, yet don't make sense to me. Nobody will explain their positions, which is...uh...aka science. I also have a thread for the other question. But this one involves probability, known as the Monty Hall Problem. Please see any number of YouTube videos on this for an explanation, I'll leave it to them to explain it. I question the predicate of all those who answer this...