Finding the Constant k in an Exponential Function with Limited Information

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the constant k in the exponential function E(z) = E(0)e^{-kz}, which describes light intensity at varying depths in water. The user seeks to determine k using the information that E(3) = 0.01E(0). They attempt to manipulate the equation but struggle with eliminating E(3) to isolate k as a numerical constant. A participant points out that the correct formulation includes the base 'e' and suggests that the user should be able to solve for k using the provided relationship. The conversation highlights the application of Beer's law in this context.
dragonblood
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I have a problem with an exponential function. I am wondering if an exact solution is possible, or if I have to write the solution as a logarithm of an unknown.

A formula says that E(z)=E(0)^{-kz}, where E is light intensity and z is depth in water. My objective is to find the constant k. I also know that E(3)=0.01E(0).

I have tried to solve for k in the following way:

E(3)=0.01E(0)

E(3)=100E(3)^{-3k}
\ln |0.01E(3)|=-3k \ln|E(3)|

I realize that all values except for k is a constant, however, I do not know the value of E, and my question is: Are there any ways to eliminate E(3) from the equation, leaving k=numerical constant?

-dragonblood
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
dragonblood said:
I have a problem with an exponential function. I am wondering if an exact solution is possible, or if I have to write the solution as a logarithm of an unknown.

A formula says that E(z)=E(0)^{-kz}, where E is light intensity and z is depth in water. My objective is to find the constant k. I also know that E(3)=0.01E(0).

I have tried to solve for k in the following way:

E(3)=0.01E(0)

E(3)=100E(3)^{-3k}
\ln |0.01E(3)|=-3k \ln|E(3)|

I realize that all values except for k is a constant, however, I do not know the value of E, and my question is: Are there any ways to eliminate E(3) from the equation, leaving k=numerical constant?

-dragonblood

The formula you have is Beer's law, and E(z) is the intensity of light at a given depth. E0 is the input intensity, or intensity at depth 0.

In your post, you have omitted the all important "e". The relation would normally be given as follows:

E(z) = E_0 e^{-kz}​

You should be able to solve this for k, given E(3) = 0.01 E(0).

Cheers -- sylas
 
Thanks!
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K