Exponential operator multiplication

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the challenge of manipulating operators within exponentials in quantum mechanics. The original poster is struggling to recall how to combine operators, specifically in the expression e^{\hat{U^{\dagger}}}\hat{A}e^{\hat{U}}. They explored using a power series expansion but found it unhelpful, leading to a request for guidance. Participants suggest using an exponential identity involving commutators to simplify the problem, noting that the dagger of a unitary operator often simplifies calculations. The conversation highlights the complexities of operator algebra in quantum mechanics and the importance of understanding commutation relations.
Dracovich
Messages
87
Reaction score
0
1. I have a fairly straight forward problem (or basically, i need help to just get started on my problem), i have forgotten all my QM and am in a "bit" over my head here. Basically i am having problems remembering how one would go about treating operators that are inside exponentials.



2. So i have e^{\hat{U^{\dagger}}}\hat{A}e^{\hat{U}} and basically was just wondering how one combines the A and U operator in some way



3. I honestly didn't get very far, looking through some of the basic coursebooks for QM i didn't find it at least in an obvious place (as in where they explain the basic properties of operators) and looking around/googling etc the closest i got was to represent it as a power series, i tried writing that out and see if it got me somewhere but i couldn't see how it was suppose to help me (although I'm sure it should).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use the Taylor Expansion of exp with the U-operator as argument.

\mathrm{e}^{x} = \sum^{\infin}_{n=0} \frac{x^n}{n!} = 1 + x + \frac{x^2}{2!} + \frac{x^3}{3!} + \cdots
 
Thanks, i had kind of gotten that far (as noted in 3, perhaps it's not called power series, sorry about that). Guess i got it right but I'm just not good enough to go from there lol, well at least i know that's definitely what i should be working with, cheers!
 
Is there a particular A and U that you have in mind?
 
Yes, didn't mention it since i figured i'd try to just get a boost here and finish on my own, but the actual thing looks like this:

e^{-i\theta \hat{J}^{\dagger}}\big(\frac{\hat{a_{0}}}{\hat{a_{1}]} \big) e^{i\theta \hat{J}}

I can't find the command for vector notation so i had to use \frac, but that's not a fraction, it's a vector

\hat{J}=(\hat{a_{0}}^{\dagger}\hat{a_{1}]+\hat{a_{1}}^{\dagger}\hat{a_{0}})/2

where a_0 and a_1 (and the daggers that is) are the creation and annihilation operators.

I tried writing it out and seeing what happens when the operators J and a get multiplied, but I'm honestly horrible at this, it was probably a mistake taking this course seeing as how it's been over 2 years since i last even looked in a quantum book and wasn't that great to begin with hah, but there you go, might as well stick it out as i can't opt out anymore.
 
Last edited:
\vec{your vector}

Why don't you show us a bit of your attempt to solution?

It is required to get help you know..
 
I would if i had much to show :) I'm afraid I'm fairly clueless, like i mentioned i had only gotten so far as writing the exponential operator out in a power series, and also writing out explicitly the a operators multiplying with a single J operator in hopes that it would give me some insight, but no luck. But don't worry about it, the class is today so it's too late anyway :) Thanks though, i really do appreciate the help given so far.
 
There's an exponential identity that you can use instead of expanding it all out.

<br /> e^{\hat{-\hat{B}}}\hat{A}e^{\hat{B}} = \hat{A} + [A,B] + 1/2![A,[A,B]] + 1/3![A,[A,[A,B]]] + ...<br />

Because often times, the dagger of a unitary operator is just the negative of it. And the brackets denote the commutator. In many problems, the commutator [A,B] = scalar so only the first two terms are non-zero since [A,(any constant)] = 0.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K