Express this trajectory in terms of proper time

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around expressing the trajectory of an object moving along the x-axis in terms of proper time. The original poster describes their attempts to derive the relationship between proper time and coordinate time, noting the complexity due to the non-constant speed of the object and the resulting transcendental function.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the integration of the relationship between proper time and coordinate time, with some questioning the inversion of the resulting function. The original poster mentions using the Lorentz factor and expresses uncertainty about how to proceed after finding a transcendental function.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the mathematical notation and integration process. The original poster acknowledges a correction regarding their integration approach and expresses a need for further pointers to ensure they are on the right track.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes that they are working with a specific trajectory equation and are required to express variables in terms of proper time, which adds complexity to their calculations. There is also mention of formatting issues with LaTeX in the discussion.

JTFreitas
Messages
18
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Consider an object whose motion is described by ##x(t) = \frac{c}{\kappa}(\sqrt{1+\kappa^2 t^2} -1)##, where ##c## is the speed of light and ##\kappa## is some constant. Express ##x## and ##t## as a function of proper time.
Relevant Equations
$$\frac{dt}{d \tau} = \gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}$$
The object moves solely on the $x$-axis, hence I calculated its speed to be $v_x = \frac{dx}{dt} = \frac{c \kappa t}{\sqrt(1+\kappa ^{2} t^2$ Because its speed is not constant, I suppose the Lorentz factor $\gamma = \gamma (t)$, and by plugging in the velocity, I obtain $\gamma = \sqrt(1+ \kappa ^2 t^2)$

I was told to integrate the relationship between $d\tau$ and $dt$ which is just $d\tau = \frac{dt}{\gamma}$. However, integrating this to obtain $\tau$ as a function of $t$ yields a transcendental function that can't exactly be inverted (to express $t$ in terms of $\tau$), and I am stuck in what to try here, in order to obtain the trajectory $x(\tau)$.

Edit: probably obvious but $\tau$ is the proper time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need two dollar signs to delimit Latex.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JTFreitas
Homework Statement:: Consider an object whose motion is described by $$x(t) = \frac{c}{\kappa}(\sqrt{1+\kappa^2 t^2} -1)$$, where ##c## is the speed of light and ##\kappa## is some constant. Express ##x## and ##t## as a function of proper time.
Relevant Equations:: $$\frac{dt}{d \tau} = \gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}$$

The object moves solely on the $x$-axis, hence I calculated its speed to be $$v_x = \frac{dx}{dt} = \frac{c \kappa t}{\sqrt{1+\kappa ^2 t^2}}$$ Because its speed is not constant, I suppose the Lorentz factor $$\gamma = \gamma (t)$$, and by plugging in the velocity, I obtain $$\gamma = \sqrt{1+ \kappa ^2 t^2}$$

I was told to integrate the relationship between ##d\tau## and ##dt## which is just $$d\tau = \frac{dt}{\gamma}$$. However, integrating this to obtain ##\tau## as a function of ##t## yields a transcendental function that can't exactly be inverted (to express ##t## in terms of ##\tau##), and I am stuck in what to try here, in order to obtain the trajectory ##x(\tau)##.

Edit: probably obvious but ##\tau## is the proper time.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JTFreitas
JTFreitas said:
Homework Statement:: Consider an object whose motion is described by ##x(t) = \frac{c}{\kappa}(\sqrt{1+\kappa^2 t^2} -1)##, where ##c## is the speed of light and ##\kappa## is some constant. Express ##x## and ##t## as a function of proper time.
Relevant Equations:: ##\frac{dt}{d \tau} = \gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}##

The object moves solely on the ##x##-axis, hence I calculated its speed to be $$v_x = \frac{dx}{dt} = \frac{c \kappa t}{\sqrt{1+\kappa ^{2} t^2}}$$ Because its speed is not constant, I suppose the Lorentz factor ##\gamma = \gamma (t)##, and by plugging in the velocity, I obtain ##\gamma = \sqrt{1+ \kappa ^2 t^2}##

I was told to integrate the relationship between ##d\tau## and ##dt## which is just ##d\tau = \frac{dt}{\gamma}##. However, integrating this to obtain ##\tau## as a function of ##t## yields a transcendental function that can't exactly be inverted (to express ##t## in terms of ##\tau##), and I am stuck in what to try here, in order to obtain the trajectory ##x(\tau)##.

Edit: probably obvious but ##\tau## is the proper time.
I fixed your maths - use #[/color]# to delimit inline maths, not $, and use $$ for "paragraph" maths. Also \sqrt needs curly brackets, not parentheses.

Your working seems to be correct. What did you get when you tried to integrate? I get a fairly straightforward expression. If you got an inverse sinh plus a term involving a square root, you solved ##d\tau=\gamma dt## instead of ##dt/\gamma##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JTFreitas
Ibix said:
I fixed your maths - use ## to delimit inline maths, not ,anduse,anduse$ for "paragraph" maths. Also \sqrt needs curly brackets, not parentheses.

Your working seems to be correct. What did you get when you tried to integrate? I get a fairly straightforward expression. If you got an inverse sinh plus a term involving a square root, you solved dτ=γdt instead of dt/γ.
Thanks for the fix. I saw the LaTeX guide now, but my brain typed with the usual inline.

Regarding the work: I found the integral through a formula: ##\ln{\kappa t + \kappa^2 t^2}##, but I just found out that the same integral can also be written as ##\sinh^{-1}(\kappa t)##. This does make the rest of the problem much easier. I am still not used to the type of functions that are common in relativity. In great part I just need pointers to make sure I am in the right path. Thank you!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71, Ibix and PeroK

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K