Decomposing arbitrary representations

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter StaticZero
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Representations
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on decomposing the reducible representation ##T = E \oplus E## of the group ##G = D_3## into a block-diagonal form. The initial representation matrix for the counter-clockwise rotation ##C_3^+## is provided, and the challenge is to find a new basis that achieves this form after a basis change. The character table approach and projectors are discussed, revealing limitations when dealing with multiple copies of irreducible representations (irreps). The discussion concludes that while the standard projectors are ineffective, examining the kernel of the operator ##r-s## can lead to identifying invariant subspaces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory, specifically the dihedral group ##D_3##.
  • Familiarity with representation theory and irreducible representations (irreps).
  • Knowledge of character tables and their application in constructing projectors.
  • Basic linear algebra concepts, particularly regarding invariant subspaces and kernels of operators.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the dihedral group ##D_3## and its representations.
  • Learn about the construction and application of projectors in representation theory.
  • Investigate the concept of invariant subspaces in linear algebra.
  • Explore advanced topics in representation theory, such as Schur's Lemma and its implications for reducible representations.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for mathematicians and physicists specializing in group theory, representation theory, and those working with symmetry in quantum mechanics or crystallography.

StaticZero
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
How to split a non-simply reducible representation?
Suppose we have a group ##G = D_3## and its reducible representation ##T = E \oplus E## where ##E## is the two-dimensional irrep. In its own basis, this representation can be written like this (I provide the operator only for ##C_3^+## group element which is counter-clockwise rotation by ##2\pi/3## around ##z##)
$$
T(C_3^+) = \begin{pmatrix}
-\frac12 & -\frac{\sqrt3}2 & 0 & 0 \\
\frac{\sqrt3}{2}&-\frac12 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & -\frac12 & -\frac{\sqrt3}{2} \\
0 & 0 & \frac{\sqrt3}{2}&-\frac12
\end{pmatrix}
$$

Suppose now that we have done a basis change and forgot what was that old basis which delivered a block-diagonal form for the representation ##T##, so in our new basis all matrices of ##T## are of generic form.

How could we find a basis in which the given representation returns to block-diagonal form?

In the case of simply reducible representation (=that consists of only copies of irreps) it can be easily done by observing the character table and constructing the projector
$$
P^{(\alpha)} = \frac{s_\alpha}{|G|} \sum_g \chi^{(\alpha)}_{g'} T_g
$$
where we sum with respect to group elements and ##s_\alpha## is the dimension of the irrep ##\alpha## and ##g' \equiv g^{-1}##.

Unfortunately, this operator does not help in case of multiple copies of irreps as in the example being investigated where ##T = E \oplus E## because it can 'filter out' only those irreps that have distinct character.

Two other projectors which I can recall for
$$
P^{(\alpha)}_i = \frac{s_\alpha}{|G|} \sum_g T^{(\alpha)}_{g', ii} T_g
$$
$$
P^{(\alpha)}_{ik} = \frac{s_\alpha}{|G|} \sum_g T^{(\alpha)}_{g', ik} T_g
$$
are neither helpful, too, by the similar reasoning.

Could you please explain whether these multiple copies of the same irreps can be 'filtered out'?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this question ill-stated, am I missing something trivial or are there other problems with it?
 
If you're just interested in the case ##G=D_3##, here's a possibility: let ##r## and ##s## be the usual generators of ##D_3##, viewed as linear operators on your ##4##-dimensional representation. Then ##r-s## has a nontrivial kernel (since in the ##2##-dimensional standard representation of ##D_3,## there is vertex on an equilateral triangle where these group elements act identically). Now if ##0\neq x\in\text{ker}(r-s),## note that ##\text{Span}(x,rx)## is a ##2##-dimensional invariant subspace. Apply the usual procedure to find an invariant complement.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K