Extending radius of convergence by analytic continuation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of extending the radius of convergence of a power series through analytic continuation. The user, Jack, posits that if an analytic function f(z) converges within |z|R1), then the power series should converge up to the nearest singular point at |z|=R2. The consensus confirms that g is indeed the analytic continuation of f, validating Jack's conclusion that the radius of convergence is R2.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of analytic functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with power series and convergence
  • Knowledge of the Principle of Analytic Continuation
  • Basic calculus, particularly differentiation and series expansion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Principle of Analytic Continuation in complex analysis
  • Learn about power series convergence and radius of convergence
  • Explore examples of analytic functions and their continuations
  • Investigate singular points and their implications in complex functions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in complex analysis, students studying analytic functions, and anyone interested in the properties of power series and their convergence behaviors.

jackmell
Messages
1,806
Reaction score
54
Hi,

Suppose I have an analytic function

<br /> f(z)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_n z^n<br />

the series of which I know converges in at least |z|&lt;R_1, and I have another function g(z) which is analytically continuous with f(z) in |z|&lt;R_2 with R_2&gt;R_1 and the nearest singular point of g(z) is on the circle |z|=R_2. Can I conclude the power series has a radius of convergence R_2 and represents both f(z) and g(z) in that domain?

I'm confident I can but not sure how to prove that. How about this:

If f(z) and g(z) are analytically continuous, then by the Principle of Analytic Continuation, they are the same function and therefore, the power series converges up to the nearest singular point of that same function which in this case, is the singular point on R_2 and therefore, the radius of convergence of the series is R_2.

Is that sufficient?

Thanks,
Jack
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you have the right idea but you've kind of written it up in an odd way. There's also the problem of your usage of the nonstandard term "analytically continuous". (One says that "g is an analytic continuation of f", and not that f and g are "analytically continuous".)

Basically what's going on here is that g is analytic in the disc |z|<R_2, so has a power series expansion there, with coefficients b_n say. But g=f in the smaller disc |z|<R_1, so $$b_n=\frac{g^{(n)}(0)}{n!}=\frac{f^{(n)}(0)}{n!}=a_n.$$
 
morphism said:
(One says that "g is an analytic continuation of f", and not that f and g are "analytically continuous".)

Ok, g is the analytic continuation of f. That sounds better.

Thanks for helping me.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K