Extension cord connected to heater - Find the power

AI Thread Summary
An extension cord made of 0.129 cm diameter copper wire and 2.7 m long is connected to a heater drawing 15.0 A on a 120V line. The resistance of the cord is calculated to be 0.00867 ohms using the formula R = p (L/A). To find the power dissipated in the cord, the formula P = RI² is used, leading to the calculation P = 0.00867 x (15.0 A)². The discussion highlights the importance of understanding that the voltage across the extension cord is not the same as the source voltage. Ultimately, the participants confirm that the power dissipated can be determined without needing to compute the voltage on the specific portion of the line.
thisisfudd
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
An extension cord made of two wires of diameter 0.129 cm (no. 16 copper wire) and of length 2.7 m is connected to an electric heater which draws 15.0 A on a 120V line. How much power is dissipated in the cord?

Do I just use P=IV?

But that leaves a lot of "extraneous" information.

My second thought was to find resistance:

R = p (L/A)
A = pir^2 = 1.29E-3^2 x pi = 5.23E-6

R = (1.68E-8) x (2.7/5.23E-6)
R = .00867

But then I'm not sure what to do from there.

Using P=IV I get 1800 W. But then do I have to multiply by length and area?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Obviously u cannot use the 1800W...That's the power dissipated by the SOURCE...For the line,u need to use another formula
P=RI^{2}

Daniel.

P.S.The potential between the ends of the chord in NOT 120V...:wink:
 
OK, so I have found resistance, .00867. So then I can use P = RI^2?

P = .00867 x (15.0A)^2?

Your PS is intriguing but of course I don't understand. Are you saying that it draws 15 A on a 120 V line but I have to find what it draws on this line, given the voltage of this line? How would I go about finding that? Let's see what I know: resistance, and a ratio of current to voltage?

If V = IR

V/I = .00867

OK, I'm stuck. Please help!
 
You found the power without computing the voltage on the specific portion.You're done.


Daniel.
 
Huh. Awesome. Thanks for your help!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top