External gravity field independent of mass distribution?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Gauss' law as it applies to gravity, specifically regarding the gravitational flux through a Gaussian surface enclosing a continuous mass distribution. It is established that an arbitrary redistribution of mass within this surface does not alter the total gravitational flux, confirming that gravity remains unchanged over the surface. However, the gravitational field can vary across different sections of the surface, indicating that while total flux is conserved, local variations in the gravitational field are possible.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss' law in the context of gravitational fields
  • Familiarity with gravitational flux and its mathematical implications
  • Knowledge of continuous mass distributions in physics
  • Basic principles of potential field theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical derivation of Gauss' law for gravity
  • Explore the implications of gravitational flux in astrophysics
  • Investigate potential field theory and its applications in physics
  • Examine case studies involving mass redistribution and gravitational effects
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of gravitational theory, and anyone interested in the principles of gravitational fields and their mathematical foundations.

JP O'Donnell
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi.

Gauss' law applied to gravity states that the gravitational flux through a given surface is proportional to the total enclosed mass.

Considering a gaussian surface which encloses a continuous mass distribution, an arbitrary re-distribution of the total mass must yield the same value for the gravitational flux over the same surface. And since the surface integration element has not changed this means that gravity has not changed over the surface.

This is just the nonuniqueness of causative source distributions in potential field theory.

Are there any errors in the above argument?

Basically all I want to confirm is that a redistribution of mass within a given equipotential surface does not alter gravity on that surface.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JP O'Donnell said:
Considering a gaussian surface which encloses a continuous mass distribution, an arbitrary re-distribution of the total mass must yield the same value for the gravitational flux over the same surface.
The total flux through the closed surface doesn't change.
And since the surface integration element has not changed this means that gravity has not changed over the surface.
But the flux/field through any particular section of the surface can certainly change.
 
thanks. Appreciate your help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
892
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
4K