Extreme Engineering

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hornbein
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 1K views
Hornbein
Gold Member
Messages
4,120
Reaction score
3,284


An extremely massive and unwieldy weapon. I knew about the WWI railroad artillery but for WWII Deutschland outdid itself. To bear the weight the railroad line had to have two parallel tracks for a total of four rails. Then two more rails at the firing site for the crane used to assemble the gun. Two locomotives were required for aiming. It had handbrakes. The shells could penetrate four feet of steel armor. When fired the crew of four thousand had to be 250m away. The blast shattered windows several kilometers distant. It was used to shell Sevastopol.
 
Last edited:
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and Lischka
Physics news on Phys.org
Gadget madness. Too elaborate to summarize. Is it hyperLEGO?

 
Reply
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: Borg
Jet engines run at 1500 C but the turbine blades don't melt. Ninety years of engineering.