Are Engineering Math Courses Extremely Intensive?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the intensity and pace of math courses in engineering programs, particularly focusing on calculus and its prerequisites. Participants share personal experiences and concerns regarding their mathematical preparedness for engineering studies.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about their lack of recent math experience and questions how intensive engineering math courses, particularly calculus, will be.
  • Another participant describes the structure of freshman calculus courses, suggesting that they may not require much independent thought and often involve repetitive problem-solving methods.
  • A different participant shares their experience of self-teaching calculus and managing to keep up despite a lack of formal math education prior to college, indicating that logical thinking skills can carry over.
  • Some participants note that many students struggle with calculus due to insufficient precalculus knowledge, rather than the calculus material itself.
  • There is a mention of a perceived difference in the nature of math courses, with some participants feeling that true mathematical understanding begins only after completing basic calculus and moving into more advanced topics like analysis and modern algebra.
  • One participant emphasizes the effectiveness of certain textbooks, particularly Dover publications, for self-study and understanding complex concepts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the intensity of engineering math courses. While some share positive experiences with self-study and foundational skills, others highlight the challenges posed by a lack of preparation. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to prepare for these courses.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention varying levels of prior math education and self-study experiences, indicating that individual preparedness may significantly affect their success in engineering math courses. There is also a noted reliance on specific textbook resources, which may not be universally applicable.

Scuzzle
Let me start by giving a bit of background information about myself: I'm 24 in April. I'm a business student. When I first started college, I chose business because I really had no idea what to do and business was the route I took for safety. Flash forward to the present, where I've been in school for 3 years, and just realized this was the biggest mistake I've ever made. Slowly, my mind has been changing on the matter, and I've finally found something I wouldn't just feel safe doing, but something I think I would love doing. I'll get on with the purpose of the thread. If I continue on in this matter I'll make my way into philosophy and I'll save that for its respective forum :-p

Obviously, I've chosen a career in engineering. Electrical, to be exact. By now, you probably completely understand the thread title. There are two reasons for my concern: 1) I haven't taken a math class in two years, 2) My math knowledge is mostly founded on what I learned attending one of the worst school in Houston, TX.

I had a natural ability in math and physics, finding them so easy in high school and early college that they were always on the back burner while I focused on my other courses, and I did very well in them anyway. However, I'm afraid that I may have lost the wit required to do math, since I haven't been feeding those parts of my brain in years.

I know that I should begin to bone up on them. If I switch majors, I will have until the Fall semester to ready myself for college-level Calculus and Physics courses. I'm planning on taking tutorials, and I've already begun reading some very good Dover publications ("How to Calculate Quickly" by Henry Sticker, and "Essential Calculus with Applications" by Richard Silverman).

My real question is (did it take me long enough to get here?) how intensive are the math courses for engineering degrees? How quickly do they move? Assuming I didn't spend the next several months revamping my mathematic mind, would I be in for hell once I began freshman level Calculus? To put it in an awful sounding way: Do they hold your hand, or is it a free-for-all?

Thanks for any help. And any other advice you think is applicable to my situation would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Freshman calculus does not require much independent thought.

-The book will read
"This is how problems of type 1237 are solved..."
"here are 10 examples..."
"here are 3 for you to do so you understand"
-in lecture they will say
"suppose we have a problem type 1237, here is how we solve it..."
"now watch as I do 5 of them..."
-In homework you will be required to do 30
-in office hours someone will ask "how do we solve problem type 1237?"
The TA will say "you saw that in lecture"
student says "I do not understand"
TA repeats what the professor says at 1/2 speed
student says "I still do not understand"
TA repeats what the professor says at 1/3 speed
student says "I am starting to get it"

As far as not understanding any of the math before calculus, yes that can make calculus much harder. In fact it is likely more students fail calculus because of lack of precalculus than because of calculus itself. Calculus can be learned by almost anyone who puts in the effort.
 


Thanks. You've settled something for me. I was going to just refresh precalculus on my own, but now I'm going to take it in the summer just make sure I get a great handle on everything I've forgotten over the years.

I appreciate the reply :smile:
 


The highest math course I took in high school was pre-algebra.
I never took Algebra, Trig, pre-calc, or calc when I returned to college...for math and physics.

I self taught myself differential calc and took Calc II and Calc III in my first semester back...I really had to work to keep up on the concepts from earlier classes that I'd never had, but I ended up okay.

There is still a random concept that is "old hat" to everyone else that is new to me, but I feel I'm pretty well caught up and have done well in my math courses.

If you did well in math before, I'd imagine you'll be fine. If you have the ability for logical mathematical thought, I'm sure that will carry over.

I'm still new to math and am only taking Differential Equations and Linear Algebra, but it seems to me that until you get through the typical Calculus, linear algebra, diff eq series...you're given much more application rules than theory...at least that's what I've seen.

Talking to students in more advanced classes...it seems they didn't feel they really started "Math" until they started analysis and modern algebra.
I've had physics students tell me they never felt they were "doing physics" until E&M too.
I don't know if you'll feel the same way...but I've found self studying to be MUCH easier with those little "teach yourself" soft cover books that are somewhat "out of date."

I still pick up one of those books for differential equations when our textbook takes 12 pages to poorly explain a concept...it always seems those old books make everything much more obvious...in much less space.

Could be me though
 


Yeah. At this point, I've determined that Dover publications do the best teaching job of any textbook I've ever used, regardless of concentration.

Thanks for the reply.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
9K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K