Extremely rare "ball lightning" phenomena caught on video.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the rare phenomenon of ball lightning, which was captured on video and has sparked debate regarding its nature and existence. Participants emphasize that while ball lightning is generally accepted in scientific circles, it remains largely unexplained and is distinct from UFO phenomena. The video in question has been criticized for its lack of detail and potential CGI origins, with some users expressing skepticism about the object's behavior and its implications of sentience. Overall, the discussion highlights the ongoing intrigue and research surrounding ball lightning.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ball lightning phenomena
  • Familiarity with video analysis techniques
  • Knowledge of scientific skepticism and methodology
  • Awareness of historical context regarding unexplained phenomena
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the scientific studies on ball lightning and its characteristics
  • Explore video analysis tools for evaluating authenticity
  • Investigate the historical reports and photographs of ball lightning
  • Learn about the differences between unexplained and unidentified phenomena
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, physicists, and enthusiasts interested in unexplained natural phenomena, as well as those studying the intersection of science and public perception regarding rare atmospheric events.

ElliotSmith
Messages
167
Reaction score
104
Extremely rare ball lightning phenomena was captured on video.

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, ElliotSmith!

Highly improbable. Observe the context of the video: no additional elements except the recording camera.

Greetings!
 
Nice one, but without details and some post-case investigation it's not really useful.

Please note, that 'ball lightning' is not like UFOs - they are just unexplained, but their existence is mostly accepted and considered worthy of research.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron
It's hard to believe that's not a sentient being. It just trots across the track and heads off into the trees
 
rsk said:
It's hard to believe that's not a sentient being. It just trots across the track and heads off into the trees
I'm not seeing anything that implies sentience. It just moves in a more or less straight line. So what?
 
It knows exactly where it's going.
 
rsk said:
It knows exactly where it's going.

Certainly acts like somebody who has some urgent matters in the bush o0)
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: DennisN, Wrichik Basu and rsk
rsk said:
It knows exactly where it's going.
That's not an explanation of why you think that. I'll take a guess and assume that because you don't know/can't see what is making it move, you are jumping to an assumed conclusion that it is intelligence (which, note, still doesn't explain how it is moving). That's very unscientific thinking.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50
That'll be it, I'm sure.
 
  • #10
ElliotSmith said:
Extremely rare ball lightning
rsk said:
It knows exactly where it's going.
Rive said:
Certainly acts like somebody who has some urgent matters in the bush
Ball lightning are like Cicadas -- they stay hidden for many years, and only surface to, well, you know... :wink:
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron, DennisN, rsk and 1 other person
  • #11
@ElliotSmith:

Cool video. I don't know what it is. The object seems to be far brighter than what other reports of ball lightning usually indicate (see e.g this post). At least that is my understanding of the ball lightning phenomenon.
 
  • #13
Rive said:
Nice one, but without details and some post-case investigation it's not really useful.

Please note, that 'ball lightning' is not like UFOs - they are just unexplained, but their existence is mostly accepted and considered worthy of research.

Which is funny in a couple of ways. Firstly, "unexplained" versus "unidentified", hardly a big difference. And there is very little evidence for ball lightning. Yet it is generally accepted because it doesn't imply anything "extraordinary" [a totally subjective term]. All that it took for most scientists at the time was a fuzzy photo from a Park Ranger and suddenly it was a respectable subject.

Same for earthquake lights. It was considered crackpottery until a Japanese man got a few fuzzy photos.
 
Last edited:
  • #14
onatirec said:
https://thedebrief.org/ball-lightning-and-the-unidentified-aerial-phenomena-mystery/

This site has a higher-quality version of the same video. Apparently when it was first posted in 2019 the description more clearly stated that it was in fact CGI.

One thing that caught my eye was the lightning coming from the ball. I have read many ball lightning reports and didn't remember ever hearing that claim.

It reminds me a bit of an early CGI fake of two UFOs, clearly what appear to be alien spacecraft s, flying over a vacation resort on some island. The video was very convincing at first glance. But the hardcore UFO crowd had it spotted as a fake right away. The two UFOs made banking turns as if flying aerodynamically. And everyone knows, they argued, "real UFOs" don't make banking turns. LOL! True story!
 
  • #15
This was, I believe, the first photo of alleged ball lightning, taken by a Park Ranger IIRC, that was widely reported as legitimate.

1625819857086.png

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/628709.stm

Here is another photo thought to be legit that I posted here 15 years ago LOL!
1625820125476.png

https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/scientific-facts-yet-to-be-explained.124130/post-1016112
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
16K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K