Factoring 3rd degree polynomial for eigenvalues

Click For Summary
To find the eigenvalues of the given matrix, the characteristic polynomial -x^3 + 7x^2 - 15x + 9 needs to be factored. The rational root theorem suggests testing the integer factors of -9 for possible roots. Using synthetic or long division can help determine if any of these integers are actual factors. A method to rule out negative roots involves substituting x = -y, revealing that the polynomial does not have positive roots. Once a root is found, the remaining quadratic can be factored to complete the solution.
hops1
Messages
24
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Was given a matrix
To find the eigenvalues I set up the characteristic equation
[-1-x | 7 | -5 ]
[-4 | 11-x | -6 ]
[-4 | 8 | -3-x]

With some dirty work I got this bad boy out, which I'm having trouble factoring
-x3+7x2-15x+9

Homework Equations


Looking for method to factor it, without aid of calculator
Or if there's a better way to determine the equation which will give me the factors without setting up a polynomial

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried the grouping method but that doesn't work since all I end up with is
-x2(x-7)+3(5x-3)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hops1 said:

Homework Statement


Was given a matrix
To find the eigenvalues I set up the characteristic equation
[-1-x | 7 | -5 ]
[-4 | 11-x | -6 ]
[-4 | 8 | -3-x]

With some dirty work I got this bad boy out, which I'm having trouble factoring
-x3+7x2-15x+9


Homework Equations


Looking for method to factor it, without aid of calculator
Or if there's a better way to determine the equation which will give me the factors without setting up a polynomial

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried the grouping method but that doesn't work since all I end up with is
-x2(x-7)+3(5x-3)

Use the rational root theorem on the polynomial ##x^3 - 7x^2 + 15 x - 9##; that is, look for roots among the + or - integer factors of -9.
 
Ray Vickson said:
Use the rational root theorem on the polynomial ##x^3 - 7x^2 + 15 x - 9##; that is, look for roots among the + or - integer factors of -9.

Thanks I forgot about that theorem.
But how do I rule out the negative or positive integers?
 
You can rule out a potential root r by discovering that x - r is not a factor of your cubic polynomial. The rational root theorem says that the possible rational roots for your cubic are 1, -1, 3, -3, 9, and -9.

Use either long division or synthetic division to determine whether x - 1, x - (-1), x - 3, x - (-3), x - 9, or x - (-9) are factors. If one of these is a factor, the remainder will be zero. If it's not a factor, the remainder will be nonzero.
 
Mark44 said:
You can rule out a potential root r by discovering that x - r is not a factor of your cubic polynomial. The rational root theorem says that the possible rational roots for your cubic are 1, -1, 3, -3, 9, and -9.

Use either long division or synthetic division to determine whether x - 1, x - (-1), x - 3, x - (-3), x - 9, or x - (-9) are factors. If one of these is a factor, the remainder will be zero. If it's not a factor, the remainder will be nonzero.

Thanks
 
hops1 said:
Thanks I forgot about that theorem.
But how do I rule out the negative or positive integers?

In this case you can put x = -y to find that the polynomial has the form p(x) = -q(y), where ##q(y) = y^3 + 7 y^2 + 15 y +9##. Obviously, q(y) does not have any positive roots (all its coefficients are > 0), so p(x) does not have any negative roots. This type of trick does not always work, but it happens to be OK in this example. Even if it did not work, you could just try out all the factors of -9 to see if one of them sets p(x) = 0. As soon as you find one that works you can stop checking and start again with the resulting quadratic remaining factor.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K