Jasongreat
Vanadium 50 said:The modern concept of a "PhD" goes back only to the mid-to-late 19th century. That excludes Newton (who, incidentally, did have a degree from Trinity), Faraday, and possibly Tesla and Edison. Yale adopted the modern PhD program in 1861, being the first school in the US to do so. Edison would have been 14 then. Edison was a very successful inventor and businessman, but made few if any contributions to fundamental science. Tesla's situation is particularly unclear - some sources say he had a degree from Graz, others say he did not.
Einstein had a PhD from ETH.
I would encourage you to take a look at Nobel prize winners in Physics and see how far back you have to go to find one without an advanced degree.
Woops, Sorry for being wrong(not the first time and surely not the last). Youre right I should have checked into my argument a lot better. I agree that Edison doesn't really fit in here, as we were discussing acedemics, but I included him to show that good things CAN and DO happen outside the institution, and that it is not absolutely neccesary to go into the institution in order to be successfull, so if you do CHOOSE to go into the system you should try to abide by the system you chose to go to, instead of going but not doing what they ask of you and then bitching about being treated unfairly. Sorry again I should have known better than to try and get a faulty argument by a bunch of physicists. It is surely not my intention to be thrown into the group of people that whine about 2+2 being three, but so far I feel that's where I have placed myself on this forum.
P.S. Even though it was my mistakes that lead to my being corrected, and thank you for correcting me as my statements were barely worth the time taken to correct them, Was I Treated Fairly? LOL.