Falling capacitor connected to constant voltage

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on two methods for analyzing the motion of a falling capacitor connected to a constant voltage: energy analysis and force method. Both methods yield the same final expression for the velocity of the capacitor plate, highlighting the contributions of gravitational potential energy and electrostatic energy. A key point raised is the omission of the battery's chemical energy in an alternative solution, which leads to an incorrect prediction of an imaginary final speed in a zero-gravity scenario. The conversation emphasizes the importance of clearly defining the system in energy analysis to ensure accurate results. Ultimately, both methods are validated, demonstrating consistency in the physics involved.
palaphys
Messages
266
Reaction score
17
Homework Statement
An air filled parallel plate capacitor with plate separation $d$ and area $A$ is connected to a constant voltage source $V$. The plates are horizontal and the top plate is free to move vertically without rotation. The system is in vacuum and friction is absent. If the upper plate is released from a height $d$, what is its speed when the separation becomes $d/2$?
Relevant Equations
Kinematics+Capacitor equations
1762623572128.webp

I have tried to proceed with two methods, which agree with each other
i) Energy analysis
If we use work energy theorem,
##
\sum W = \Delta K
##

So,
##
W_{\text{bat}} + W_{\text{field}} + W_{\text{grav}} = K_f \quad \text{(at } x = d/2 \text{)}
##

Battery work:
##
W_{\text{bat}} = V \cdot (C_i V) = C_i V^2 = \frac{\varepsilon_0 A V^2}{d}
##

Change in electrostatic energy:
##
\Delta U_{\text{elec}} = U_f - U_i
= \frac{1}{2} C_f V^2 - \frac{1}{2} C_i V^2
= \frac{1}{2}(2C_i)V^2 - \frac{1}{2} C_i V^2
##
##
\Delta U_{\text{elec}} = C_i V^2 - \frac{1}{2} C_i V^2
= \frac{1}{2} C_i V^2
##

Change in gravitational potential energy:
##
\Delta U_{\text{grav}} = U_{g,f} - U_{g,i}
= Mg\left(\frac{d}{2}\right) - Mgd
= -Mg\frac{d}{2}
##

Substituting in the work–energy theorem:
##
M v^2 = C_i V^2 + Mg d
##
##
v^2 = \frac{C_i V^2}{M} + g d
##

Final expression using ##(C_i = \frac{\varepsilon_0 A}{d}\)##
##
\boxed{v = \sqrt{\frac{\varepsilon_0 A V^2}{M d} + g d}}
##

ii) force method:
##
\text{Let } x \text{ be the downward displacement (so } x=0\text{ at start, } x=d/2 \text{ at end).}
##

Net downward force:
##
F_{\text{net}} = mg + \frac{1}{2}\frac{\varepsilon_0 A V^2}{(d - x)^2}
##
then I applied 2nd law:
##
m\,v\frac{dv}{dx} = mg + \frac{1}{2}\frac{\varepsilon_0 A V^2}{(d - x)^2}
##

integrating from initial ##\((x=0,\,v=0)\)## to final ##\((x=d/2,\,v=v)\)##:
##
\int_{0}^{v} m v\,dv
=
\int_{0}^{d/2} \left( mg + \frac{1}{2}\frac{\varepsilon_0 A V^2}{(d - x)^2} \right) dx
##

LHS
##
\frac{1}{2} m v^2
##

RHS
##
mg\frac{d}{2}
\;+\;
\frac{1}{2}\varepsilon_0 A V^2
\int_{0}^{d/2} \frac{dx}{(d - x)^2}
##

integration:
##
\int_{0}^{d/2} \frac{dx}{(d - x)^2}
=
\left[-\frac{1}{d-x}\right]_{0}^{d/2}
=
-\frac{1}{d - d/2} + \frac{1}{d}
=
\frac{1}{d}
##

Thus:
##
\frac{1}{2} m v^2
=
mg\frac{d}{2}
+
\frac{1}{2}\frac{\varepsilon_0 A V^2}{d}
##

So
##
v^2 = \frac{\varepsilon_0 A V^2}{m d} + g d
##
##
\boxed{v = \sqrt{\frac{\varepsilon_0 A V^2}{m d} + g d}}
##

I hope both my methods are right. however, in the solution presented right below the problem, work done by the battery is not accounted for at all. Who is wrong here and why?(see below)
1762624406215.webp
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your two methods look correct.

I did catch a spot where you have two compensating errors:

palaphys said:
1762627997603.webp

Check the signs in this calculation. However, your result of ##\frac 1 d## is correct.

To see that their answer can't be correct, suppose the experiment is done in zero gravity.
 
TSny said:
Your two methods look correct.

I did catch a spot where you have two compensating errors:
I'm not able to edit it right now, but thanks for pointing it out.
TSny said:
To see that their answer can't be correct, suppose the experiment is done in zero gravity.
how is that possible? even their solution has included the effect of gravity right
 
palaphys said:
how is that possible? even their solution has included the effect of gravity right
Yes, they correctly accounted for gravity. But, they did not account for the change in chemical energy ##U_{chem}## of the battery. Their solution predicts an imaginary value for the final speed of the plate for the case where ##g = 0.##

This is a good problem for demonstrating the importance of clearly defining your "system".

If we take the capacitor, the earth, and the battery as the system, then we have an isolated system. So, ##\Delta E_{sys} = 0##. Then $$\Delta U_{cap} + \Delta U_{grav} + \Delta U_{chem} + \Delta K = 0.$$
If we consider the capacitor and the earth as the system, then the battery acts as an external agent doing work on the system. Then, $$W_{bat} = \Delta U_{cap} + \Delta U_{grav} + \Delta K.$$
Other possibilities are:
(a) Choose the capacitor to be the system,
(b) Choose just the top plate of the capacitor to be the system.

What would the work-energy equation look like for these two choices?

If set up correctly, all of these different choices for the system will yield the same answer for the speed of the plate.
 
Last edited:
If have close pipe system with water inside pressurized at P1= 200 000Pa absolute, density 1000kg/m3, wider pipe diameter=2cm, contraction pipe diameter=1.49cm, that is contraction area ratio A1/A2=1.8 a) If water is stationary(pump OFF) and if I drill a hole anywhere at pipe, water will leak out, because pressure(200kPa) inside is higher than atmospheric pressure (101 325Pa). b)If I turn on pump and water start flowing with with v1=10m/s in A1 wider section, from Bernoulli equation I...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
37
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K