Falling Objects With Different Mass

  • Thread starter Thread starter BL4CKCR4Y0NS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Falling Mass
Click For Summary
Galileo's experiment demonstrated that objects of different masses fall at the same rate when air resistance is negligible, due to the uniform acceleration of gravity (g). The gravitational force on a heavier object is greater, but its larger inertial mass results in the same acceleration as a lighter object. This principle is derived from Newton's Second Law, where the acceleration (a) of any object is equal to g, independent of mass. The discussion also clarifies that while the relative acceleration between two falling objects may change, their absolute acceleration remains constant when referenced from the center of mass. Ultimately, both objects will hit the ground simultaneously when dropped from the same height.
BL4CKCR4Y0NS
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
I've heard and read many times about Galileo and his standing up in the Leaning Tower of Piza. How he dropped two objects of different mass and proving that the two objects hit the floor at the same time if released at the same time.

What I never understood ... was WHY this happened. What causes the two objects to hit the floor at the same moment.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is because, ignoring air resistance, all objects accelerate downwards with the same acceleration, g. While the gravitational force acting on a more massive object is greater than that acting on a less massive object, the more massive object still accelerates downwards at the same acceleration as the less massive object due to the more massive object possessing a larger inertial mass.

To simplify issues, we approximate the Earth's gravitational field to be uniform such that the value of g remains constant. The gravitational force acting on a body of mass m on Earth is then F_{g} = mg. From the simplified version of Newton's Second Law, we have F = ma. Combining, we see that the acceleration a of the body is simply g - independent of its mass.
 
Oh yeah .. that makes sense.

Thanks. :)
 
Saying that "we approximate the Earth's gravitational field to be uniform such that the value of g remains constant" may appear to be begging the question.

In more detail, The gravitational force between two bodies is F= GmM/r^2 where G is a universal constant, m and M are the masses of the two bodies and r is the distance between their centers. Take the Earth to be one body and the object to be dropped to be the other. The radii of two different objects are so small compared to the radius of Earth that "r" can be taken as a constant for any object dropped at the surface of the earth. As Fightfish said, the second law is F= ma so for any object we have GmM/r^2= ma and can cancel the two "m"s: a= GM/r^2 for any object dropped at the surface of the earth.

Since two objects always have the same acceleration and start with speed 0 ("dropped" not "thrown down"), the always have the same speed at any time and so always drop the same distance in the same time.
 
The problem I had in understanding the universality of free fall was this: If increasing the mass of the falling object also increases the force, then why is there no effect on acceleration? The truth of the matter is that the relative acceleration does increase. In other words, the time that it will take for the two objects to meet will decrease. However, the universality of free fall does not refer to relative acceleration because the relative acceleration is a non-inertial frame of reference. The frame of reference for the universality of free fall is the center of mass. So if you increase the mass of the falling object you are also shifting the center of mass closer to the falling object. This has the effect of keeping it's acceleration (relative to the center of mass) the same, even though the relative acceleration has increased. So a=GM/r^2 and a_{rel}=G(M+m)/r^2.
 
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
12K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
9K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
Replies
61
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
7K