Far IR emitting fabrics increase transcutaneous oxygen levels

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 1K views
Messages
4,789
Reaction score
3,854
TL;DR
Transcutaneous oxygen levels are increased in test subjects wearing polyethylene terephalate (PET) fabric containing ceramic particles (CEL) compared to standard PET fabric.
"Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Effects of Far-Infrared Emitting Ceramic Fabric Shirts and Control Polyester Shirts on Transcutaneous PO2" K Washington et al 2018 Apr 10. doi: 10.4172/2165-8064.1000349
J Text Sci Eng. 2018; 8(2): 349.

This study affirmed the fabric's effect - increasing subcutaneous tissue oxygen levels over a control.

The ceramic particle containing fabric has applications for therapies for ischemia by increasing blood flow. The fabric re-radiates long wave infared radiation which penetrates epidermal tissues. The FDA approved this fabric as a medical device.

News release from 2017:

https://www.prnewswire.com/news-rel...-and-general-wellness-products-300493298.html

The link also has a dumbed-down explanation for the product's properties that serve to increase flow of blood to tissues just under the skin.

The reason I posted this is that I saw an ad and thought it was hard to believe. Turns out it is based in some science. There are lots of companies making ceramic embedded fabric products. You can google for 'nih polyethylene teraphthalate fabric' to start reading about it.

Example application: Type II diabetics with poor blood sugar management often have poor peripeheral circulation, like in the foot. Increasing oxygen levels in the damaged tissues there improves patient quality of life. My adult kids are diabetics with lots of problems. So I often look up case studies and other research.
 
Reply
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: Oldman too, pinball1970, berkeman and 1 other person
Biology news on Phys.org
It's good to know that something like this is out there, and it looks like it has been tested in a controlled group. It would be interesting to know the size of the groups, how long the study was done, and other details.