Faraday's Law and Stokes Theorem

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 3K views
CGI
Messages
74
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


upload_2018-2-21_14-52-9.png


Homework Equations


Stokes Theorem

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm having a tough time "cancelling" out integrals from both sides of an equation (if possible). On the right hand of the equation, we know since it is a closed curve, that Stoke's Theorem applies and we can change the integral of ∫E⋅dr to ∫∇×E dA. On the left hand of the equation, we can insert d/dt into the integrand since it is independent of dA, giving us ∫dB/dt dA.

Overall, After moving the negative side over, we have:
-∫dB/dt dA = ∫∇×E dA

Now, from what my TA told me, he said there was a way to justify the "cancellation" of the integrals. I'm assuming they have the same bounds, but he gave me a hint and said it was something related to what I learned in Calc I, but having done so in only 1D.

Anyone have any ideas? It would be much appreciated!
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-2-21_14-52-9.png
    upload_2018-2-21_14-52-9.png
    11.3 KB · Views: 1,769
Physics news on Phys.org
CGI said:

Homework Statement


View attachment 220817

Homework Equations


Stokes Theorem

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm having a tough time "cancelling" out integrals from both sides of an equation (if possible). On the right hand of the equation, we know since it is a closed curve, that Stoke's Theorem applies and we can change the integral of ∫E⋅dr to ∫∇×E dA. On the left hand of the equation, we can insert d/dt into the integrand since it is independent of dA, giving us ∫dB/dt dA.

Overall, After moving the negative side over, we have:
-∫dB/dt dA = ∫∇×E dA

Now, from what my TA told me, he said there was a way to justify the "cancellation" of the integrals. I'm assuming they have the same bounds, but he gave me a hint and said it was something related to what I learned in Calc I, but having done so in only 1D.

Anyone have any ideas? It would be much appreciated!

Basically, you have that ##\int \int_S \mathbf{U} \cdot d\mathbf{A}= \int \int_S \mathbf{V} \cdot d\mathbf{A}## for every "suitable" region ##S##, and then need to show that this gives ##\mathbf{U} = \mathbf{V}## at all points.

The standard way to try proving such things is to apply it so an "infinitesimal" region ##A## surrounding a point ##\mathbf{r}_0 = (x_0,y_0,z_0)## and appeal to continuity of the vector fields ##\mathbf{U}## and ##\mathbf{V}## around ##\mathbf{r}_o## to show that we must have ##\mathbf{U}(\mathbf{r}_0) = \mathbf{V}(\mathbf{r}_0)##.