MHB Farhan and Junhao score points

  • Thread starter Thread starter Johnx1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Points
Johnx1
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Farhan and Junhao had the same number of points in a game. After Farhan got another 470 points and Junhao got another 50 points, Farhan had 3 times as many points as Junhao. How many points did each of them have at first?

My answer:

Farhan = F
Junhao = J

We know F = H,
F = F + 470
J = J + 50
F = 3J

so then I did,

F + 470 = J + 50

3J + 470 = J + 50

J = -210.

Then I pluged it back into 3J + 470 = J + 50

so I get -160 = -160.

I'm not sure what I did wrong. Also, I know the answer is 160.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Johnx said:
Farhan and Junhao had the same number of points in a game. After Farhan got another 470 points and Junhao got another 50 points, Farhan had 3 times as many points as Junhao. How many points did each of them have at first?

My answer:

Farhan = F
Junhao = J

We know F = H,

Okay, you are good up to here. So in fact we really only need one variable...let's let \(O\) by the number of points both originally had. So, next let's look at the statement:

After Farhan got another 470 points and Junhao got another 50 points, Farhan had 3 times as many points as Junhao.

After Farhan got another 470 points, his number of points is:

$$O+470$$

After Junhao got another 50 points, his number of points is:

$$O+50$$

And "Farhan had 3 times as many points as Junhao" then means we can write:

$$O+470=3(O+50)$$

We can now solve this equation to find \(O\), which is what the question asks us to find. What do you get?
 
MarkFL said:
let \(O\) by the number of points both originally had. So, next let's look at the statement:

After Farhan got another 470 points and Junhao got another 50 points, Farhan had 3 times as many points as Junhao.

After Farhan got another 470 points, his number of points is:

$$O+470$$

After Junhao got another 50 points, his number of points is:

$$O+50$$

And "Farhan had 3 times as many points as Junhao" then means we can write:

$$O+470=3(O+50)$$

We can now solve this equation to find \(O\), which is what the question asks us to find. What do you get?

So then I did:

F = H
F = O + 470
H = O + 50

We also know F = 3(J)O+470=3(O+50)

O = 160

Thank you.
 
Johnx said:
Farhan and Junhao had the same number of points in a game. After Farhan got another 470 points and Junhao got another 50 points, Farhan had 3 times as many points as Junhao. How many points did each of them have at first?

My answer:

Farhan = F
Junhao = J
Okay, good. However, I would have said "F is the number of points Farhan scored and J is the number of points[/g] Junhao scored. "Farhan" and "Junhao" are people[/g] not numbers!

We know F = H,
Where did "H" come from? Did you mean "J"?

F = F + 470
J = J + 50
No! you are using "F" to represent the number of points Farhan had initially. You cannot use the same letter to represent the number of points Farhan had later. And, algebraically, "F= F+ 470", subtracting "F" from both sides, gives 0= 470 which is certainly not true!

F = 3J
Rather F+ 470= 3(J+ 50)

so then I did,

F + 470 = J + 50

3J + 470 = J + 50

J = -210.

Then I pluged it back into 3J + 470 = J + 50

so I get -160 = -160.

I'm not sure what I did wrong. Also, I know the answer is 160.
You had, above, F+ 470= 3(J+ 50) but F= J so you can use just a single letter to represent that number- say F+ 470= 3(F+ 50)= 3F+ 150.

3F- F= 470- 150
2F= 320
F= 320/2= 160
 
Country Boy said:
No! you are using "F" to represent the number of points Farhan had initially. You cannot use the same letter to represent the number of points Farhan had later. And, algebraically, "F= F+ 470", subtracting "F" from both sides, gives 0= 470 which is certainly not true!

thank you for pointing that out :-)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top