Undergrad Velocity u > c? Faster Than Light Comm?

  • Thread starter Thread starter f todd baker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Communication
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of faster-than-light communication using an array of moving wires. It is established that while the point where the wires cross can move faster than light, it does not transmit information, aligning with special relativity principles. The key point is that changes in wire spacing cannot propagate faster than the speed of light, as the transmission speed is limited by the material properties of the wires. Even in an idealized scenario, the practical limits of information transmission speed are significantly slower than light, constrained by the speed of sound in the wire material. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes that no information can be communicated faster than light, regardless of the wire configuration.
f todd baker
Messages
61
Reaction score
22
On my website (unnamed since I have been previously reprimanded for "promoting" the site!) I got a question, pretty straightforward, the essence of which is: Two long wires are not parallel and make an angle θ with each other; they cross at one point and one wire is moving with velocity v perpendicular to the first; the point where they cross moves with a velocity u.
fasterthanlife.JPG


It is easy to show that u=v/tanθ and u may be larger than c. But this point has no mass and carries no information so, no problem with special relativity (just like a sweeping laser spot moving across the moon with v>c). But then I got a followup question suggesting having an array of moving wires the spacing of which is coded information. What am I missing?
 

Attachments

  • fasterthanlife.JPG
    fasterthanlife.JPG
    5.5 KB · Views: 447
Physics news on Phys.org
If the distance between the wires changes, that change can not travel along the wire at infinite speed. In fact it is limited to c or less.
 
All wires but one are moving with the same velocity and are parallel. The distance between any two of them does not change.
 
Oh. I missed that. There is nothing that says that information set up earlier can not be read fast. The wires that you describe can not be set up over a distance faster than c. It would take a long time to set up the parallel wires of that length. Your example is just a more complicated case of sending information and storing it in a safe in a distant location. Then the safe can be opened and read instantly. That does not mean that the information was transmitted instantly.
 
  • Like
Likes Dale
I second @FactChecker here. The information is transmitted at the time of setting up the spacing between the wires. The diagonal wire is actually completely irrelevant.
 
No information is being transmitted in the u direction - it's being transmitted in the v direction. It's just that observers spaced perpendicular to that get the information with different delays. The only way to communicate in the u direction is to poke one of the wires as it passes, and then this is just a complicated variant on "can I communicate faster than light by pushing a rigid rod".
 
f todd baker said:
But then I got a followup question suggesting having an array of moving wires the spacing of which is coded information. What am I missing?
The coding can't travel faster than ##c##.
 
Though this is an idealized thought experiment: here's some practical cold water tossed on it:

The speed of transmission will be far slower than c; it is limited to the speed of sound in the material that the wires are made of.

Even if they were made of the hardest substance currently known - diamond - their best transmission speed will be only 12km/s - the speed of sound in diamond.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
833
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K