Feedback on Educational Script: What's a particle in QFT?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter norwegian_hobby_sci
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qft
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the challenges faced by a non-physicist attempting to create a YouTube educational video on Quantum Field Theory (QFT) and the Standard Model. Participants express skepticism regarding the creator's qualifications and the accuracy of the content, particularly concerning the measurement problem and wave function collapse. Key points include the misconception of particle size in quantum physics and the implications of hidden-variables theory, as illustrated by the double-slit experiment. The conversation highlights the importance of expertise in educational content creation, especially in complex scientific topics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Field Theory (QFT)
  • Familiarity with the measurement problem in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of wave function collapse and its implications
  • Awareness of the double-slit experiment and its significance in quantum physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the measurement problem in Quantum Mechanics
  • Study the concept of wave function collapse in detail
  • Explore hidden-variables theory and its critiques in quantum physics
  • Examine the double-slit experiment and its role in demonstrating quantum behavior
USEFUL FOR

Individuals interested in Quantum Field Theory, educators in physics, content creators in science education, and anyone seeking to understand the complexities of quantum mechanics.

norwegian_hobby_sci
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Whats a particle in QFT?
I'm trying to create a YouTube educational science video on Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model. I'm not a physicist (just a hobby), and would love feedback on my explanation below, and help to point out (or rewrite) parts that are scientifically inacurate or misleading. Or just point me to literature.

"But something weird happens whenever we try to measure where a particle is in these fields - whether through our senses or instruments. This weirdness is related to what quantum scientists call “the measurement problem” or “the wave function collapse”. You see, when we make a measurement and locate a particle, the strengths of the field instantly changes into that particularly outcome. The field gets a big excitation at that particular point and close to 0 elsewhere. These excitations, which in some ways define the size of a particle, can be as small as we want depending on how accurate our measurement instrument is - so the concept of a particle size in quantum physics almost doesn't make much sense. In many cases, physicists simply assume that particles have a size of a point, i.e. 0, and their calculations and observations still work out. So in fact, what we call particles are nothing more than these measured excitations in the corresponding fields.

At this point you may mistakenly be thinking that the particle (i.e. excitation) exist before we measure, but we dont know about it until after the measurement. This is called hidden-variables theory and has been called into question by several experiments. For example in the double-slit experiment we can see that the spread out wave patterns of the quantum field strength before measurement affect real-world outcomes. This wave state of the quantum field are the best explanation for how the field can interact with itself and produces wave-like interference patterns [This last paragraph has been less polished by me]."
 
Physics news on Phys.org
norwegian_hobby_sci said:
I'm trying to create a YouTube educational science video on Quantum Field Theory .... I'm not a physicist
Um, why?

We spend a lot of time here trying to resolve problems caused by people who made YouTRube videos and didn't know what they were talking about. You are surely an expert in something...cooking, plumbing, playing the mandolin, whatever. Why not make a video about that?

As far as the text at hand, there's a lot to argue about, starting from the very first line, "start to measure". QM worked long before there were people around to measure anything.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dextercioby and berkeman
Thread closed temporarily for Moderation...
 
Thread reopened provisionally...
norwegian_hobby_sci said:
I'm trying to create a YouTube educational science video on Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model. I'm not a physicist (just a hobby),
So let me get this straight -- You have no idea what you are doing, and you want us to give you valuable information that you can pass off as yours and make money off of YouTube like you know what you are doing. Do I understand the situation correctly?

IBTL+...
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz, DaveE, hutchphd and 2 others
So you admit that you're not a physicist, but you want to explain physics? Maybe you should consider a career in journalism? Journalists don't explain things themselves (normally), they interview people that know what they are talking about. They also explain to their audience who is doing the explanation. Why would your viewers care what you think about QFT?

The thing about education (before YouTube et.al.) is that educators had to be vetted to demonstrate that they know what they are teaching. But you are saying something like 'I don't understand this, but I'll teach it to others'. This isn't likely to get a great reaction from people that do know the material.

Have you ever heard about Dunning-Kruger? It might be applicable here.

Maybe videos of cats doing cute things? That seems to work (lots of clicks!!!), and you don't have to go to school for 16 years to explain it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz, berkeman, Vanadium 50 and 1 other person
Yeah, this thread is done.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz and DaveE

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
944
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K