MHB Felix's question at Yahoo Answers regarding Newton's method

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around using Newton's method to find a root of the equation f(x) = 0, given that the line y = 5x - 2 is tangent to the curve y = f(x) at x = 4. At this point, f(4) equals 18, and the derivative f'(4) is 5. Applying Newton's method with the initial approximation x1 = 4, the second approximation x2 is calculated as x2 = 4 - (18/5), resulting in x2 = 2/5. This outcome aligns with the expectation that the second guess is the root of the tangent line. The discussion effectively demonstrates the application of Newton's method in this context.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Suppose the line y = 5x − 2 is tangent to the curve y = f(x) when x = 4. If Newton's method is used to loc?

Suppose the line y = 5x − 2 is tangent to the curve y = f(x) when x = 4. If Newton's method is used to locate a root of the equation f(x) = 0 and the initial approximation is x1 = 4, find the second approximation x2.

x2 = ___?______4.8, 4

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can see my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Felix

Since the line $y=5x-2$ is tangent to the function $f(x)$ at $x=4$, we know two things:

a) The function and the line have a common point at $x=4$:

$$f(4)=5(4)-2=18$$

b) At $x=4$ the function's derivative is equal to the slope of the line:

$$f'(4)=5$$

Now, Newton's method gives us:

$$x_{n+1}=x_{n}-\frac{f\left(x_n \right)}{f'\left(x_n \right)}$$

If the initial approximation is $$x_1=4$$, then the second approximation is:

$$x_{2}=x_{1}-\frac{f\left(x_1 \right)}{f'\left(x_1 \right)}=4-\frac{18}{5}=\frac{2}{5}$$

As we should expect, the second guess is simply the root of the tangent line:

$$0=5x_2-2\implies x_2=\frac{2}{5}$$
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top