FEM: How the weak form is related to an inner product

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the relationship between the weak form of the finite element method (FEM) and inner products, specifically in the context of coercivity and continuity. The weak form is defined as a(u,v)=l(v), where a(u,v) is a bilinear form involving the gradients of functions u and v, and l(v) is a linear form incorporating a source term and boundary conditions. Key concepts include the L2 norm, defined as ||u||_2:=√(∫_Ω u²), and the application of Poincaré's inequality and embedding theorems to demonstrate coercivity and continuity of the forms.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the finite element method (FEM)
  • Familiarity with weak formulations in functional analysis
  • Knowledge of Sobolev spaces, particularly H^1_0(Ω) and L²(Ω)
  • Concept of inner products and norms in Hilbert spaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Poincaré's inequality and its applications in FEM
  • Research embedding theorems related to Sobolev spaces
  • Explore the properties of bilinear and linear forms in variational formulations
  • Learn about coercivity and continuity in the context of functional analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, researchers in numerical analysis, and practitioners of the finite element method seeking to deepen their understanding of weak formulations and their mathematical foundations.

Carla White
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi all, I am a final year maths student and am doing my dissertation in the finite element method. I have gotten a little stuck with some parts though.

I have the weak form as a(u,v)=l(v) where:
$$a(u,v)=\int_{\Omega}(\bigtriangledown u \cdot\bigtriangledown v)$$
and
$$l(v)=\int_\Omega fv-\int_{\partial\Omega_N} g_Nv$$.
I am trying to prove that a(u,v) is coercive and continuous and l(v) is continuous. I know to do this I need to relate these to an inner product with norm, I'm pretty sure this should be the L2 norm:
$$||u||_2:=\left(\int_\Omega u^2\right)^{1/2}$$.
I'm struggling to understand how these relate though, and how I get from the linear and bilinear forms to the normed form. Could somebody either explain how it works or point me in the direction of somewhere that explains it.

Thanks
Carla
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi Carla,
I am actually working on a similar problem right now.
Poincare's inequality is a good place to start.
I think that embedding theorems are useful for the second part as well. I haven't worked it all the way through yet, but I think if you can show that the gradient is in a closed and bounded space, e.g. ##H^1_0(\Omega)## and that space is also contained within ##L^2(\Omega)## you can conclude that the variational formulation is coercive.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K