Fermat1
- 180
- 0
In your opinion did Fermat have a proof for his theorem?
The discussion centers on the question of whether Pierre de Fermat had a proof for his famous Last Theorem. Participants argue that Fermat likely believed he had a simple proof but later found it unworkable, as evidenced by his subsequent publication of proofs for specific cases (n=3 and n=5). The consensus suggests that if a more elementary proof existed, it would have been discovered by the many mathematicians who attempted to solve the theorem over the centuries. Overall, the discussion concludes that Fermat did not possess a universally valid proof for all integers n.
PREREQUISITESMathematicians, historians of mathematics, and students interested in the development of number theory and the legacy of Fermat's Last Theorem.
HallsofIvy said:Hey, if Fermat doesn't know!
My opinion (and it is only an opinion) is that what happened is what happens to all of us. Fermat thought that he had a simple proof, wrote a quick note to that effect, then went to bed. And discovered when he tried to carry out the proof, that he it did not work. That is supported by the fact that after he wrote that, he published proofs of the theorem for the cases n= 3 and 5. He wouldn't have done that if he had a proof for all n.
Fermat said:To my mind it doesn't really make sense that this kind of problem doesn't have a more elementary (less artificial I mean) solution. Having said that, if Fermat had a proof, he would have written it