Fermat1
- 180
- 0
In your opinion did Fermat have a proof for his theorem?
The discussion revolves around whether Pierre de Fermat had a valid proof for his famous theorem, particularly in light of the lack of a complete proof found among his writings. Participants explore the implications of Fermat's claims and the nature of mathematical proof in this context.
Participants generally express skepticism about Fermat having a valid proof that would hold up, but there is no consensus on the specifics of what he may have thought or attempted.
Participants acknowledge the historical significance of Fermat's theorem and the efforts of mathematicians over the centuries to resolve it, which may influence their views on the existence of a proof.
HallsofIvy said:Hey, if Fermat doesn't know!
My opinion (and it is only an opinion) is that what happened is what happens to all of us. Fermat thought that he had a simple proof, wrote a quick note to that effect, then went to bed. And discovered when he tried to carry out the proof, that he it did not work. That is supported by the fact that after he wrote that, he published proofs of the theorem for the cases n= 3 and 5. He wouldn't have done that if he had a proof for all n.
Fermat said:To my mind it doesn't really make sense that this kind of problem doesn't have a more elementary (less artificial I mean) solution. Having said that, if Fermat had a proof, he would have written it