Fermi-Walker Transport in Kerr Spacetime - Comments

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers around a blog post titled "Fermi-Walker Transport in Kerr Spacetime," submitted by Greg Bernhardt. A participant pointed out a typographical error regarding the spacetime studied, clarifying that the correct terms are Minkowski and Schwarzschild spacetime, not Minkowski and Kerr. The typo was acknowledged and corrected by the author, indicating a collaborative effort to maintain accuracy in scientific discourse.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fermi-Walker transport
  • Familiarity with Kerr spacetime concepts
  • Knowledge of Minkowski and Schwarzschild metrics
  • Basic principles of general relativity
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Fermi-Walker transport in detail
  • Study the properties of Kerr spacetime
  • Explore Minkowski and Schwarzschild metrics in general relativity
  • Examine the implications of typographical accuracy in scientific writing
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of general relativity, and researchers interested in the nuances of spacetime metrics and their implications in theoretical physics.

Messages
49,509
Reaction score
25,528
Greg Bernhardt submitted a new blog post

Fermi-Walker Transport in Kerr Spacetime
kerr_Spacetime.png


Continue reading the Original Blog Post.
 

Attachments

  • kerr_Spacetime.png
    kerr_Spacetime.png
    14.7 KB · Views: 899
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt
Physics news on Phys.org
Just a minor typo in the first paragraph: I think you mean to say we studied the efects in Minkowski and Schwarzschild spacetime before, not Minkowski and Kerr.

Sorry to just sound grumpy with typos, but I don’t really have questions at this point. I do appreciate the writeup.
 
Orodruin said:
Just a minor typo in the first paragraph

Fixed, thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K