Fermilab Muon g-2: How Do Muons Form?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the production of muons for the Fermilab Muon g-2 experiment, specifically focusing on the energy requirements for proton collisions that generate pions, which subsequently decay into muons. Participants explore the concept of "magic momentum" related to muon behavior in a storage ring and the implications of this momentum on measurements of the muon magnetic moment.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that protons collide with a graphite target to produce pions, which then decay into muons, and questions the energy required for these processes.
  • Another participant states that muons are selected to have a magic momentum of 3.094 GeV, with protons at 8 GeV and pions having an intermediate momentum.
  • A third participant references slides that indicate pions have a momentum of 3.1 GeV and discusses the decay process of pions into muons.
  • One participant questions the term "magic momentum," seeking clarification on its significance and whether it is merely a poetic term.
  • A later reply explains that "magic momentum" relates to the dynamics of muons in a magnetic field and how it minimizes the effects of electric fields, providing a mathematical expression for this relationship.
  • Another participant raises concerns about the circularity of using the muon magnetic moment to determine the optimal energy for measuring it, suggesting that this might complicate the argument.
  • A subsequent response counters the circularity concern by noting the precision of the muon magnetic moment measurement and suggesting that the magic momentum can be viewed as the point where electric field effects are minimized.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of "magic momentum" and the potential circularity in its determination. There is no consensus on the significance of the term or the methodology used in the measurements.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific energy values and momentum measurements, but the discussion does not resolve the implications of these values or the underlying assumptions regarding the physics involved.

Bluecom
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I was reading about Fermilab moving their new storage ring to the Muon Campus for the Muon g-2 experiment. I was curious about how the produce the Muons. I understand that protons hit a graphite target producing pions that quickly decay into Muons. How much energy are is required? How much energy do the protons have in order to produce the pions? And what is the energy of the exiting Muons and final electrons?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The muons are selected to be at tghe magic momentum of 3.094 GeV. The protons are at 8 GeV. The pions are in between.
 
These of slides have a nice summary of the experiment. For the record, the pions have a momentum of 3.1 GeV according to the slides. Which makes sense, since
[itex]\pi^+ \rightarrow \mu^+ + \nu_\mu[/itex]
https://indico.cern.ch/event/234546/session/9/contribution/20/material/slides/1.pdf

ETA: The slides also explain the concept of "magic momentum", and will be interesting to anybody who is into accelerator physics.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
The muons are selected to be at tghe magic momentum of 3.094 GeV. The protons are at 8 GeV. The pions are in between.

why are you calling the momentum magic? is there something extraordinary/interesting about that value? or did you want to sound poetic?
 
ChrisVer said:
why are you calling the momentum magic? is there something extraordinary/interesting about that value? or did you want to sound poetic?

The slides I linked to had the explanation for the concept of magic momentum. In a magnetic field, muons will move in horizontal circular motion, as you require in a storage ring, but you will also inevitably have some vertical component. The way around this would be to use electrostatic quadrupoles, but that adds more complications.

[itex]\omega_a = \frac{e}{mc}(a_\mu B - (a_\mu - \frac{1}{\gamma^2 - 1}(B \times E ))[/itex]

But then you need to measure E. But if you choose γ=29.3, the coefficient goes to 0, which corresponds to 3.09 GeV, and

[itex]\omega_a = \frac{eB}{mc}a_\mu[/itex]

Thus, magic momentum.
 
This looks a bit circular - you use aμ to determine the best energy to measure aμ. But I'm sure they took this small effect into account, and there is indeed just a single aμ value that fits to observations (so it is possible to solve this circular argument).
 
The muon magnetic moment is known to something like 11 decimal places, so the magic momentum is also known to something to a few parts per billion. The beam momentum has a spread of a few parts per thousand. So there's no problem with circularity. If you like, think of it as the momentum where the effect of the electric field is smallest, rather than identically zero.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 96 ·
4
Replies
96
Views
16K
  • · Replies 83 ·
3
Replies
83
Views
15K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
11K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K