Fermions Bosons vertices in SM - but no SUSY

  • Level: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Lapidus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bosons Fermions Susy
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
7 replies · 2K views
Lapidus
Messages
344
Reaction score
12
In the Standard Model fermions interact via exchanges of massless (virtual) spin-1 particles. Fermions are turned into a boson. How is that different from the SUSY transformation that turns fermions into bosons?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lapidus said:
In the Standard Model fermions interact via exchanges of massless (virtual) spin-1 particles. Fermions are turned into a boson
Fermions are not turned into bosons in the exchange in the SM (unless in s-channel where two fermions combine into a generally off-shell boson).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lapidus
In addition the Orodruin's answer: An interaction (something physical happening) is not a symmetry transformation (a mathematical operation).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lapidus and vanhees71
Also note that the weak interaction is mediated by massive vector bosons, the ##W## (charged) and ##Z## (neutral) bosons.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lapidus
SUSY is not telling you that a fermion becomes a boson, it tells you that for each fermion there is a bosonic partner particle (super-partner). The two are related via supersymmetric transformations.
So the fact that the electron+positron annihilate let's say to 2 photons, doesn't tell you that the photon is the superpartner of the electrons/positrons (which are the selectrons)...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lapidus
Parhaps the question can be reformulated to how different
mfb said:
In addition the Orodruin's answer: An interaction (something physical happening) is not a symmetry transformation (a mathematical operation).

But the W and Z and gamma are symmetry transformations, generator of SU(2)xU(1), and they are particles too. It could be argued that they just happen to be particles in the defining representation of the symmetry, but then the question translates to "when do symmetries have associated particles"?

Particularly, er, specifically, what happens with the generator of supersymmetry? It seems that in this case it is not compulsed to appear as an associated particle interacting with all the others, is it? If it were, we should have diagrams where a fermion interacts with another one and becomes a boson.
 
Not the gauge fields are the generators of the symmetry but the corresponding Noether-charge operators. Of course you are right in saying that the gauge fields are Lie-algebra valued vector fields, i.e., something like ##\mathcal{A}_{\mu} =A_{\mu}^a \hat{t}^a##, where ##\hat{t}^a## are the Lie-algebra basis matrices in the representation of the field you apply the corresponding gauge-covariant derivative to, ##\mathrm{D}_{\mu} = \partial_{\mu} + \mathrm{i} g \mathcal{A}##.
 
arivero said:
what happens with the generator of supersymmetry?
See 7.5 of Stephen Martin. When global susy is spontaneously broken, the resulting goldstino can transform particles to their superpartners. In local susy, i.e. supergravity, the gravitino has this property.