Feynman diagrams from Quarks and Leptons Halzen and Martin?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the interpretation of Feynman diagrams as presented in "Quarks and Leptons" by Halzen and Martin, specifically the differences between figures (b) and (c). It is established that figure (c) is not a Feynman diagram but illustrates color conservation in Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD). The gluon, which carries color and anti-color, is represented with a double line due to its color index, while photons, being neutral under electromagnetic interactions, do not possess a similar gauge index. The conversation also touches on the potential existence of a hypothetical figure (e) that parallels the relationships between figures (a), (b), and (c).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Feynman diagrams and their applications in particle physics
  • Familiarity with Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) and its principles
  • Basic knowledge of gauge theories, specifically non-abelian gauge theories
  • Concept of color charge and color conservation in particle interactions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the role of color indices in Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD)
  • Explore the differences between abelian and non-abelian gauge theories
  • Learn about the mathematical representation of gluons as matrices
  • Investigate the implications of gauge invariance in particle physics
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, students of quantum field theory, and anyone interested in the detailed workings of Feynman diagrams and color charge in particle interactions.

Spinnor
Gold Member
Messages
2,227
Reaction score
419
Feynman diagrams from "Quarks and Leptons" Halzen and Martin?

The following scan is from Quarks and Leptons: An Introductory Course in Modern Particle Physics, Francis Halzen (Author), Alan D. Martin (Author), page 9. Can I take anything from the topological difference between figure (b) and (c)?

Thanks for any help!
 

Attachments

  • Feynman207.jpg
    Feynman207.jpg
    20.9 KB · Views: 920
Physics news on Phys.org


Diagram (c) is not a Feynman diagram, just a way of illustrating the fact that color is exactly conserved. You can follow a continuous path that traces the B color, in one line and out the other. A gluon carries color and anti-color, so the two lines in the middle of the diagram both belong to the same gluon.
 


Referring to the scan above, does there exist a new diagram that could have been included in the book "Quarks and Leptons", call it figure (e), such that,

Figure (b) is to figure (c) as figure (a) is to figure (e)? See figure (e) below.

If so can we think that the photon is equal opposite currents that cancel perfectly or nearly perfectly?

Thanks for any help!
 

Attachments

  • Feynman210.jpg
    Feynman210.jpg
    16.7 KB · Views: 772


Spinnor said:
Referring to the scan above, does there exist a new diagram that could have been included in the book "Quarks and Leptons", call it figure (e), such that,

Figure (b) is to figure (c) as figure (a) is to figure (e)? See figure (e) below.

If so can we think that the photon is equal opposite currents that cancel perfectly or nearly perfectly?

Thanks for any help!

The photon is not composed of equal opposite currents and neither is the gluon. As Bill_K said, the diagrams of the type (c) include additional information about the color index of the fields. In QCD (an example of a so-called non-abelian gauge theory), the gluon has a color index and is therefore charged under the corresponding interaction. To further understand the difference requires some group theory. Simply put, in terms of color-components, quarks and antiquarks are like vectors, while gluons are matrices. Gluons then carry a pair of indices, so it makes sense to draw them with a double line in (c). Photons do not have a color-like index (QED is a U(1) or abelian gauge theory), so there is no reason to draw a diagram analogous to (c). The lack of a gauge index corresponds to the fact that photons are neutral under the EM interaction.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K