Meir Achuz
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
- 3,727
- 242
But, it is ##\alpha##, not ##\epsilon_0##, that is actually measured.vanhees71 said:Well, the discussion is about the question, whether there's a theoretical explanation for the value of the fine structure constant. This has been asked since Sommerfeld introduced it when treating the fine structure of the hydrogen spectrum using Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization. It's indeed an ironic coincidence that he gets the fine structure right without introducing spin (which is pretty impossible within Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization anyway) by just solving the relativistic equations of motion of a classical point particle in a Coulomb field.
Now the fine structure constant is, in the SI, simply
$$\alpha=\frac{e^2}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 \hbar c}.$$
With the new SI the question about the status of its understanding is very easily answered: in the above formula ##e## ("elementary electric charge", ##\hbar=h/(2 \pi)## ("modified Planck's action quantum"), and ##c## ("speed of light in vacuo") are all defined constants fixing our system of units, but ##\epsilon_0## has to be measured, i.e., it cannot be derived somehow from any theory. So the value of ##\alpha## is an empirical input in our contemporary best theory we have (in this case the Standard Model of elementary particle physics).