Feynman Parameters: Solving an Induction Problem

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Perturbation
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Feynman Parameters
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a mathematical induction problem involving Feynman parameters and an identity related to integrals. Participants explore the proof of the identity and share resources for further understanding, while also addressing issues with formatting and clarity in the original post.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in understanding and proving an identity related to Feynman parameters, suggesting that they might be missing an obvious step due to illness.
  • Another participant points out that the original post lacks clarity, particularly regarding the identity and hint provided.
  • A third participant proposes a substitution (y = A_1A_2...A_{n-1}) as a potential solution to the problem.
  • Additional participants share links to external resources that explain Feynman parameters and the limits of integrals in more detail.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion does not appear to reach a consensus on the proof of the identity, with multiple suggestions and resources provided but no definitive resolution to the problem presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants note issues with the clarity of the original post, which may affect understanding. The discussion includes various approaches and resources but lacks a complete resolution of the mathematical steps involved.

Perturbation
Messages
124
Reaction score
0
Hey, this is a pretty simple induction problem, but I suck at induction and I think I'm missing something really obvious here, though trying to figure it out whilst having a pretty bad cold isn't much of a good idea.

The identity

[tex]\frac{1}{A_1\cdots A_n}=\int_0^1 dx_1\cdots dx_n \delta (\sum_i^nx_i-1) \frac{(n-1)!}{[A_1x_1+\cdots +A_nx_n]^n}[/tex]

Can be proven inductively, given that we know it works for n=2, by the use of

[tex]\frac{1}{AB^n}=\int^1_0 dxdy \delta (x+y-1)\frac{ny^{n-1}}{[Ax+By]^{n+1}}[/tex]

I get to a certain point then just can't see what to do. Gargh...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, whatever it is, I can't really see the more relevant parts of your post... The identity and the hint.
Maybe you should edit and add it at the end until Tex decides to work again.
 
Put [tex]y = A_1A_2...A_{n-1}[/tex], it falls right out.

Carl
 
You can find the identity:
[tex]\frac{1}{A\*B^n}=...[/tex]
useful
 
http://www.physics.thetangentbundle.net/wiki/Quantum_field_theory/Schwinger-Feynman_parameters
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Or better :

http://theoretical-physics.net/dev/src/math/feynman-parameters.html

Then they explain more precisely what happens to the limits of the integrals.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K