Feynman Propagators: Invariant Amplitude vs Loop Integrals

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ryanwilk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Feynman Propagators
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the distinction between two types of Feynman propagators used in quantum field theory: \(\frac{i}{q^2-m^2}\) is specifically utilized for scalar particles, while \(\frac{i(p/+m)}{p^2-m^2}\) is designated for spin-1/2 particles, such as fermions. This differentiation is crucial for understanding their applications in invariant amplitude calculations and loop integrals. The participants confirm that the top propagator corresponds to scalar fields, while the bottom one pertains to fermionic fields.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Feynman diagrams and propagators
  • Familiarity with quantum field theory concepts
  • Knowledge of scalar and fermionic fields
  • Basic grasp of loop integrals in particle physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Feynman propagators for scalar and fermionic fields
  • Learn about the role of loop integrals in quantum field theory
  • Explore invariant amplitude calculations in particle interactions
  • Investigate the implications of spin in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum field theory, and researchers focusing on particle interactions and propagator analysis.

ryanwilk
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Hi, this is probably very simple but what is the difference between these two Feynman propagators:

\frac{i}{q^2-m^2}
\frac{i(p/+m)}{p^2-m^2}

E.g. Is one used for the invariant amplitude and the other for loop integrals? Or is one for a fermion and the other for a boson? =s

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The top one is for a scalar, the bottom one for a spin-1/2 particle.
 
Thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K