Feynman rules for Entangled photons

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of Feynman path integrals to entangled photons, specifically addressing whether the amplitude of one photon should include the amplitude of its entangled partner. Participants clarify that for two entangled photons, one must consider them as a single entity in a 6-dimensional configuration space, where each photon contributes to the overall amplitude. The conversation emphasizes that traditional interference patterns do not apply to entangled photons, and the concept of wavefunction collapse is not straightforward in this context. The Hong-Ou-Mandel effect is cited as an example of interference involving indistinguishable entangled photons.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Feynman path integrals
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics (QM) and quantum field theory (QFT)
  • Knowledge of configuration space and its dimensionality in quantum systems
  • Awareness of the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect and its implications for entangled photons
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Feynman path integrals in the context of multiple particles
  • Explore the mathematical formulation of the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect
  • Investigate the implications of wavefunction collapse in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the differences between configuration space and momentum space in quantum systems
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, graduate students in physics, researchers studying quantum entanglement, and anyone interested in the nuances of Feynman path integrals and their applications to entangled particles.

  • #31
Quant said:
There is not such thing as Feynman rules.
What? Of course there are. And if you don't think there are, why did you put them in the thread title?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Quant said:
There is not such thing as Feynman rules.
Yes, there are. They just don't mean what your thread title implies that they mean, as @Demystifier pointed out in post #26.

Quant said:
If you think it is B level
We don't. That's the point. We think the questions you are asking are A level, but your level of knowledge is not. Your level of knowledge appears to be B level, and there is no useful answer we can give you at B level. The only useful feedback we can give you at B level is to increase your level of knowledge. Study textbooks that deal with path integrals for multiple-particle systems. Then you will be able to frame questions that we can usefully answer.

Thread closed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
826
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
5K
  • · Replies 96 ·
4
Replies
96
Views
8K
  • · Replies 175 ·
6
Replies
175
Views
12K