Graduate Feynman solution for the radial wave function of the hydrogen atom

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the radial wave function of the hydrogen atom as presented in Feynman's lectures, specifically formula (19.53). The radial component is expressed as \( F_{n,l}(\rho)=\frac{e^{-\alpha\rho}}{\rho}\sum_{k=l+1}^n a_k \rho^k \). A division by zero error arises when attempting to calculate \( a_n \) using the recursive formula (19.50) under the condition \( n=l+1 \). The error is traced back to the incorrect application of the recursive formula, emphasizing that \( k \) must start at \( l+1 \) and not \( l \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and wave functions
  • Familiarity with Feynman's Lectures on Physics
  • Knowledge of recursive formulas in mathematical physics
  • Basic concepts of quantum numbers (principal, orbital-angular-momentum, and radial quantum numbers)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the radial wave function for hydrogen using quantum mechanics
  • Explore the implications of the O(4) symmetry in hydrogen atom energy eigenstates
  • Learn about the significance of quantum numbers in atomic physics
  • Review recursive sequences and their applications in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those specializing in quantum mechanics, atomic physics, and mathematical methods in physics, will benefit from this discussion.

emilionovati
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Problema in the interpretation of the Feynman solution of the Schrodinger equation for the hydrogen atom
Reading the classical Feynman lectures, I encounter the formula(19.53) that gives the radial component of the wave function:
$$
F_{n,l}(\rho)=\frac{e^{-\alpha\rho}}{\rho}\sum_{k=l+1}^n a_k \rho^k
$$
that, for ##n=l+1## becomes
$$
F_{n,l}=\frac{e^{-\rho/n}}{\rho}a_n\rho^n
$$
To find ##a_n## I use the recursive formula (19.50), but here I have problem. Using $k+1=n=l+1$ I find a division by zero.

$$
a_n =\frac{2\left( \frac{n-1}{n}-1 \right)}{(n-1)n-(n-1)n}
$$

so clearly I have a mistake. But where is it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I observe denominator of (19.50) is
n(n-1)-l(l-1)
for k=n-1. As ##n \geq l+1## it is not zero.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
But, in the (19.50) the denominator is
$$
k(k+1)-l(l+1)
$$
that, for ##k=n-1## becomes
$$
(n-1)n-l(l+1)
$$
and, since ##n=l+1## we have
$$
(n-1)n-(n-1)n
$$
 
Feynman says "This means that k must start at l+1 and end at n."
Your case, ##k=n-1=(l+1)-1=l##, does not satisfy it.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
The general formula is ##n=n_r+l+1##, where the radial quantum number ##n_r \in \mathbb{N}_0=\{0,1,2,\ldots\}## and the orbital-angular-momentum quantum number ##l \in \{0,1,2,\ldots \}##. The principle quantum number ##n \in \mathbb{N}=\{1,2,\ldots \}##. Usually the hydrogen energy eigenstates (neglecting spin) are labeled by ##(n,l,m)## (where the magnetic quantum number ##m \in \{-l,-l+2,\ldots,l-1,l\}##). The energy eigenvalues are ##E_n=-\frac{m_e e^4}{2 (4 \pi \epsilon)^2 \hbar^2 n^2}=-1 \text{Ry}/n^2## with ##1 \text{Ry} \simeq 13.6 \; \text{eV}##; ##n## is thus called the principal quantum number (that the ##E_n## do not independently depend on ##n_r## and ##l## is due to the dynamical O(4) symmetry of the hydrogen bound states; ##E_n## is ##n^2## fold degenerate).

Since ##n_r =n-l-1 \geq 0## for a given ##n## the possible values for ##l## are ##0,1,\ldots n-1##.
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K