Feynman's lectures: Newton’s Laws of Dynamics

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter YanaFFF
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explanation Mechanics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Richard Feynman's lectures regarding Newton's Laws of Dynamics, specifically focusing on equations (9.13), (9.14), and (9.15). Equation (9.13) illustrates that when velocity is constant, displacement can be calculated as the product of time elapsed and velocity. However, since velocity is time-dependent, this becomes an approximation, improving with smaller time intervals. Equations (9.14) and (9.15) relate velocity to acceleration, with the latter defined as the negative of position, as indicated in equation (9.12).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Laws of Motion
  • Familiarity with calculus concepts, particularly derivatives
  • Knowledge of basic kinematics
  • Ability to interpret mathematical equations in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and implications of Newton's Laws of Motion
  • Learn about the relationship between velocity and acceleration in classical mechanics
  • Explore the concept of limits in calculus to understand approximations
  • Review Feynman's Lectures on Physics, specifically Volume I, Chapter 9
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone seeking a deeper understanding of classical mechanics and the mathematical foundations of motion as explained by Richard Feynman.

YanaFFF
Messages
4
Reaction score
3
TL;DR
Please help me figure out equations 9.13, 9.14, 9.15 from the Feynman lectures on physics (Volume 1, Chapter 9). I don't really understand what exactly these functions mean and also why they need to be added or subtracted. (Explain as simply as possible). I will be very grateful for your help!
Physics news on Phys.org
It is hard to explain things better than Feynman :smile:

For eq. (9.13), if the velocity was constant, then
$$
x(t+\epsilon) = x(t) + \epsilon v_x
$$
would be exact, as the displacement in ##x## is time elapsed (##\epsilon##) multiplied by velocity (##v_x##). Since velocity depends on time, it is only an approximation; the smaller ##\epsilon##, the better.

Eq. (9.14), is the same, but for velocity in terms of acceleration. Eq. (9.15) follows from the fact that in this case acceleration is ##-x##, see eq. (9.12).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: YanaFFF
DrClaude said:
It is hard to explain things better than Feynman :smile:

For eq. (9.13), if the velocity was constant, then
$$
x(t+\epsilon) = x(t) + \epsilon v_x
$$
would be exact, as the displacement in ##x## is time elapsed (##\epsilon##) multiplied by velocity (##v_x##). Since velocity depends on time, it is only an approximation; the smaller ##\epsilon##, the better.

Eq. (9.14), is the same, but for velocity in terms of acceleration. Eq. (9.15) follows from the fact that in this case acceleration is ##-x##, see eq. (9.12).
Thank you very much! I agree that Feynman explains it well, but I still have gaps in my knowledge.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DrClaude

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K