I Feynman's QED; 36,000 revolutions per inch for red light.

anorlunda
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
11,326
Reaction score
8,750
In Feynman's book, QED, The Strange Theory of Light and Matter, page 27 he says, "As long as the photon moves, the stopwatch hand turns (about 36,000 times per inch for red light); when the photon end up at the photomultiplier, we stop the watch."

I've been puzzling about the significance of 36,000. The wavelength of red light is about 1/36000 inches (700 nm). So it sounds like he is saying that the angle of the "little arrows" is the same as the phase angle of the EM oscillations in the photon. But my reading of the book is that the angle of the arrows refers to probability amplitudes of virtual photons, not the phase angle of a real photon. Feynman did not elaborate.

So I'm left confused. What is the significance of 36,000? Hopefully, an I-level answer is possible.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anorlunda said:
I've been puzzling about the significance of 36,000. The wavelength of red light is about 1/36000 inches (700 nm). So it sounds like he is saying that the angle of the "little arrows" is the same as the phase angle of the EM oscillations in the photon. But my reading of the book is that the angle of the arrows refers to probability amplitudes of virtual photons, not the phase angle of a real photon. Feynman did not elaborate.
In Feynman's heuristic model it's both. If we take the double-slit, for example. The QED model must largely match the classical EM wave model. The phase of the probability amplitude must match the frequency/wavelength of the classical wave.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes hutchphd, topsquark, berkeman and 1 other person
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top