I Feynman's QED; 36,000 revolutions per inch for red light.

anorlunda
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
11,326
Reaction score
8,750
In Feynman's book, QED, The Strange Theory of Light and Matter, page 27 he says, "As long as the photon moves, the stopwatch hand turns (about 36,000 times per inch for red light); when the photon end up at the photomultiplier, we stop the watch."

I've been puzzling about the significance of 36,000. The wavelength of red light is about 1/36000 inches (700 nm). So it sounds like he is saying that the angle of the "little arrows" is the same as the phase angle of the EM oscillations in the photon. But my reading of the book is that the angle of the arrows refers to probability amplitudes of virtual photons, not the phase angle of a real photon. Feynman did not elaborate.

So I'm left confused. What is the significance of 36,000? Hopefully, an I-level answer is possible.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anorlunda said:
I've been puzzling about the significance of 36,000. The wavelength of red light is about 1/36000 inches (700 nm). So it sounds like he is saying that the angle of the "little arrows" is the same as the phase angle of the EM oscillations in the photon. But my reading of the book is that the angle of the arrows refers to probability amplitudes of virtual photons, not the phase angle of a real photon. Feynman did not elaborate.
In Feynman's heuristic model it's both. If we take the double-slit, for example. The QED model must largely match the classical EM wave model. The phase of the probability amplitude must match the frequency/wavelength of the classical wave.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes hutchphd, topsquark, berkeman and 1 other person
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top