What actually happens when light meets a surface(QED or QM)?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Christian Grey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Qm
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the interaction of light with surfaces, specifically examining the principles of Quantum Mechanics (QM) and Quantum Electrodynamics (QED). Quantum Mechanics explains transparency and opacity through energy band structures, indicating that materials can only absorb specific energy packets. In contrast, Quantum Electrodynamics focuses on the probabilistic nature of photon behavior, detailing how photons are either reflected or transmitted based on the thickness of the medium. Both theories are valid, but they address different aspects of light interaction, with Feynman's interpretations providing a foundational understanding for laypersons.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Mechanics (QM) principles
  • Familiarity with Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) concepts
  • Knowledge of energy band structures in materials
  • Basic principles of wave interference and optics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the energy band theory in solid-state physics
  • Explore the principles of light reflection and refraction in different media
  • Investigate the double-slit experiment and its implications for photon behavior
  • Learn about the mathematical formulations of QED and their applications
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those interested in optics, quantum mechanics, and the foundational theories of light behavior. This discussion is beneficial for anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of light interactions with various materials.

Christian Grey
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
I want to know what actually happens when light meets a surface like water or wood.

Quantum mechanics says that objects are neither "transparent" nor "opaque". Rather a system as a whole can accept "energy packets" in certain ranges of energy and has no states available to accept other ranges of energy. If something is "transparent" it means its energy level structure (for crystal systems this is called the "band structure") is such that it can't accept energy packets between ~1.7eV to 3.0eV which corresponds to light in the visible spectrum with wavelengths of 700nm (red) to 400nm (violet). There is of course nothing special about that particular energy range except that it happens to be the range that our human eyes have evolved to see. If I instead, for example, looked in the infrared range, like in this image:

http://www.jwst.nasa.gov/exhibit/ir2.jpg

I'd see that the man's eyeglasses are in fact opaque in that range (meaning that the glass does accept energy packets corresponding to the infrared range, even if it didn't in the visual range) and what he's holding there is a "black" garbage bag, which is in fact transparent to that range of light. Here's the same picture in the visual range:

http://www.jwst.nasa.gov/exhibit/ir1.jpg

While quantum electrodynamics says it works on by adding (magnitude only not direction) vectors (from the strange theory of light and matter) you start the stopwatch when photon leaves the light source and you stop the watch when the photon reaches the photo-detector, and then add the two vectors or more to get the resultant vector, which tells whether reflection or refraction will take place.

I am talking about what Feynman discusses about, in the book The strange theory light and matter,when he says that out of 100 photons 4 are partially reflected and 96 are transmitted,and how many photons are refracted or transmitted depends on the thickness of the glass, which he then demonstrates by using stopwatch,he places two photodetectors one above the glass and one below the glass, and starts the stopwatch when the photon moves from the light source and stops it when it has reached either of the photodetectors.

My question is which one is right QM(energy band) or QED(using stopwatch) ?
What actually happens when light meets surface like water, glass or wood? Which is right: QM or QED? Am I missing something in QED that I don't know (because it's called most complete theory of light) or it is best explained by condensed matter physics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Feynman is about as correct as you can get at the lay level - but you have to take with a bit of a grain of salt when he says you won't have to unlearn anything later.

Beyond that - it gets very very complicated - see the following for what actually happens with absorption and inside the medium
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/do-photons-move-slower-in-a-solid-medium.511177/

Like I said - it isn't correct to say you won't need to unlearn anything from Feynman - but you need to be quite advanced for it to be an issue.

Bottom line here - to start with stick with Feynman.

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited by a moderator:
As you can expect, both are right. But you want to keep things separate: your first half is about absorption, but then Feynman's thingy is about transmission/reflection: zero absorption (all photons either get transmitted or reflected). His dealing is that there is a probability for each of the two that depends on -- among other things -- the thickness of the glass. Has to do with interference between reflected and transmitted waves. (hence the prominence of the wavelength in the quantitative expressions). For the question: how a single photon can be subject to these interference expressions when it either reflects or transmits ? you are back in quantum mechanics (but simple wave mechanics and even simpler optics come up with good descriptions as well).

Just like with Feynmans ecellent expose about the double slit experiment: an individual photon, electron (, baseball ) interferes with itself !
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
839
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
8K