Field extensions and roots of polynomials

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The polynomial $$x^5+2x^4-16x^3+6x-10$$ has no roots in the field extension F of Q with [F:Q] = 24. The proof relies on the polynomial being irreducible over Q, which can be established using Eisenstein's criterion with the prime p = 2. Since the polynomial is of degree 5, it follows that [Q(a):Q] = 5. Consequently, [F:Q(a)] cannot be an integer, confirming the absence of roots in F.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of field extensions and their notation, specifically [F:Q].
  • Knowledge of polynomial irreducibility and its implications.
  • Familiarity with Eisenstein's criterion for irreducibility.
  • Basic concepts of algebraic degrees of field extensions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Eisenstein's criterion in detail to understand its applications in proving irreducibility.
  • Explore examples of field extensions and their degrees to solidify understanding of [F:Q].
  • Learn about polynomial roots and their relationships with field extensions.
  • Investigate other irreducible polynomials over Q and their implications in field theory.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebraists, and students studying field theory and polynomial irreducibility, particularly those interested in advanced algebra concepts.

mathgirl1
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Let F be a field extension of Q (the rationals) with [F:Q] = 24. Prove that the polynomial $$x^5+2x^4-16x^3+6x-10$$ has no roots in F.

Proof:

Let $$a$$ be a root of $$x^5+2x^4-16x^3+6x-10$$. Since the polynomial has degree 5 by theorem we know that $$[Q(a):Q]=5$$. If $$a \in F$$ and $$[F:Q]=24$$ then by theorem we have that $$ [F:Q] = [F:Q(a)][Q(a):Q] \implies 24 = [F:Q(a)] 5 $$ which means that $$ [F:Q(a)] $$can not be an integer which would imply that the polynomial has not roots in F.

I think this is pretty accurate but also seems kind of too simple. Can someone please confirm whether this is correct or give advice to proceed correctly?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi mathgirl,

It's not true that since the polynomial has degree $5$, then $[\Bbb Q(a):\Bbb Q] = 5$ as a direct consequence. What you've missed in your argument is that the polynonmial is irreducible over $\Bbb Q$. Since the polynomial is irreducible of degree $5$, then $[\Bbb Q(a): \Bbb Q] = 5$. The irreducibility may be proven by applying Eisenstein's criterion for the prime $p = 2$.
 
Ah ha! Yes! Thank you very much! I knew I was missing something. Much appreciated!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
779
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K