Undergrad Field Operator for Edge States

  • Thread starter Thread starter thatboi
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on confusion regarding the derivation of the field operator for Bogoliubov quasiparticles in edge states, specifically in equation (1.15). The user has a clear understanding of the preceding equation (1.14), which addresses the edge state of the first-quantized Hamiltonian. However, the transition to the field operator in (1.15) is unclear, prompting a request for clarification. Additional references to equations (1.49) and (1.50) are provided, indicating a shift from k-space to a generalized real-space formulation. The conversation highlights the complexities involved in understanding edge state physics and the associated mathematical formulations.
thatboi
Messages
130
Reaction score
20
I'm currently looking at the following set of notes and am confused at equation (1.15) where they discuss the Bogoliubov quasiparticle for the edge states. I understand up to equation (1.14), where they have solved for the edge state of the first-quantized Hamiltonian. What I don't understand is how they derived the field operator in (1.15).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In case people are curious, see the following eqns (1.49) and (1.50) in these notes and references therein. It is a generalized real-space version of what is usually used in k-space.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
576
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K