Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
- 3,920
- 48
I am reading Nicholson: Introduction to Abstract Algebra, Section 6.3 Splitting Fields.
Example 1 reads as follows: (see attachment)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Example 1. Find an extension E \supseteq \mathbb{Z}_2 in which f(x) = x^3 + x + 1 factors completely into linear factors.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The solution reads as follows:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Solution. The polynomial f(x) is irreducible over \mathbb{Z}_2 (it has no root in \mathbb{Z}_2 ) so
E = \{ a_0 + a_1 t + a_2 t^2 \ | \ a_i \in \mathbb{Z}_2 , f(t) = 0 \}
is a field containing a root t of f(x).
Hence x + t = x - t is a factor of f(x)
The division algorithm gives f(x) = (x+t) g(x) where g(x) = x^2 + tx + (1 + t^2)
, so it suffices to show that g(x) also factors completely in E.
Trial and error give g(t^2) = 0 so g(x) = (x + t^2)(x + v) for some v \in F.
... ... etc (see attachment)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My problem is that I cannot show how g(t^2) = 0 implies that g(x) = (x + t^2)(x + v) for some v \in F.
I would appreciate some help.
Peter
[Note; This has also been posted on MHF]
Example 1 reads as follows: (see attachment)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Example 1. Find an extension E \supseteq \mathbb{Z}_2 in which f(x) = x^3 + x + 1 factors completely into linear factors.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The solution reads as follows:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Solution. The polynomial f(x) is irreducible over \mathbb{Z}_2 (it has no root in \mathbb{Z}_2 ) so
E = \{ a_0 + a_1 t + a_2 t^2 \ | \ a_i \in \mathbb{Z}_2 , f(t) = 0 \}
is a field containing a root t of f(x).
Hence x + t = x - t is a factor of f(x)
The division algorithm gives f(x) = (x+t) g(x) where g(x) = x^2 + tx + (1 + t^2)
, so it suffices to show that g(x) also factors completely in E.
Trial and error give g(t^2) = 0 so g(x) = (x + t^2)(x + v) for some v \in F.
... ... etc (see attachment)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My problem is that I cannot show how g(t^2) = 0 implies that g(x) = (x + t^2)(x + v) for some v \in F.
I would appreciate some help.
Peter
[Note; This has also been posted on MHF]