Final amplitude with damping of bungee cord

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a bungee jumping scenario involving a bungee cord modeled as a spring. The problem includes determining the length of the cord needed for a jumper to just touch the water and analyzing the effects of damping on the jumper's oscillations after the initial jump.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the spring constant and the length of the cord, with one participant providing a calculation for part A of the problem. Questions arise regarding the role of friction and energy loss in the system, as well as the interpretation of terms like "final amplitude."

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights and hints to guide the original poster in their calculations. There is an ongoing exploration of how to incorporate the effects of damping into the analysis, with no explicit consensus reached on the interpretation of friction in this context.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes a lack of information regarding the damping factor or coefficient of friction, which complicates their ability to solve part B of the problem. The discussion also touches on adherence to forum rules regarding problem-solving attempts.

timetraveller123
Messages
620
Reaction score
45

Homework Statement


5. In the spectacular sport of bungee jumping,, a light elastic cord (a bungee cord) is tied tightly around the ankles of someone who jumps from a bridge of height H to which the other end of the cord is attached. The length of the cord is calculated so that the jumper, of mass m, will not quite reach the surface of the water below the bridge before he or she springs back up. Suppose the cord behaves like a spring of spring constant 10 mg/H where g is the acceleration due to gravity.

(a) How long must the cord be so that a jumper just touches the water before being pulled back up? Neglect the height of the jumper and any effects due to friction.

(b) Friction damps the up-and-down motion of the jumper that results after the initial jump. How far above the water would the jumper be when the oscillations have ceased?

Express your answers in terms of
H

so this is the question i have gotten the answer to the first part and stuck at the second part . i could at least solve it if i knew the damping factor or the coefficient of friction but the question gives nothing is there any method i can use to solve this

the given solution is (1/√5 - 1/10)H

Homework Equations


no idea which equation to use

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

You realize this post doesn't adhere to the PF rules ? 'No idea' and no attempt are real disqualifiers: they make it difficult for potential helpers to distinguish how they can help you effectively.

As a compromise, I propose you post your working for part a). The L you find there will be needed anyway for part b).
And as a hint: 'final amplitude' isn't really a good title (final amplitude is zero: the oscillations have ceased). What you want is the final stretch of the chord in order to add it to L. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: timetraveller123
ah yes sir forgot about the rules and good to see you again hope you remember me when i meant the final amplitude i meant the final stretch

my working for part A:
mgH = 1/2 k x^2

where x = H - L
L is the natural length of the chord

2mgH = 10mg/H x^2
H/√5 = X
H/√5= H-L
L = (`1-1/√5)H
answer for part A

please help me with part b thanks
 
OK, so you have a cord with length ##H(1-\sqrt{1/5})## that has a spring constant ##10mg/H##. How much does that stretch when you carefully and slowly hang a mass m from that ?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: timetraveller123
sir i did what you said using differentiation and i got the right answer thanks but why does this work as the method does not involve any friction and yet the question talks about friction what is going on as friction has removed some energy out of the system please explain
 
vishnu 73 said:
sir i did what you said using differentiation and i got the right answer thanks but why does this work as the method does not involve any friction and yet the question talks about friction what is going on as friction has removed some energy out of the system please explain
I would not have termed it friction. The cord will not be perfectly elastic, so some energy is lost in each oscillation. But what we call it is not important here.
If you attach a mass to a spring and lower it carefully, in your hand, say, the weight does work on your hand as well as on the spring.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: timetraveller123
ok thanks sir would you mind helping me with a another problem but it is about special relativity i have been having a lot of problem with special relativity or should i open another thread for that thanks!
 
vishnu 73 said:
ok thanks sir would you mind helping me with a another problem but it is about special relativity i have been having a lot of problem with special relativity or should i open another thread for that thanks!
Definitely a new thread.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU
ok
 

Similar threads

Replies
44
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K