MHB Find ∠A & ∠C in Triangle Geometry

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lemoine
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometry Triangle
AI Thread Summary
In triangle ABC, with internal bisectors AD and CE intersecting at points D and E, given angles ∠CED=18° and ∠ADE=24°, angle ∠B is calculated to be 96°. The challenge lies in determining angles ∠A and ∠C, which are found to be 12° and 72°, respectively, through geometric constructions and trigonometric relationships. A suggested method involves dropping perpendiculars from points E and D to the respective bisectors, leading to further angle relationships. Ultimately, the calculations confirm the angles as derived from both geometric and trigonometric approaches.
Lemoine
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Let △ABC be a triangle. Let AD and CE be its internal bisectors, with D lying on BC and E lying on AB. Given that ∠CED=18° and ∠ADE=24°, how can I find angles ∠A and ∠C without aid of softwares? Angle ∠B is easy to calculate, as
∠CED+∠ADE=∠CAD+∠ACE=∠A+∠C2=180°−∠B2
42°=180°−∠B2
∠B=96°
The other angles are difficult to calculate. I made this construction on Geogebra and got ∠A=12° and ∠C=72°(exactly), but I'm not being able to find them by geometric constructions. A teacher suggested me to drop perpendiculars from E to AD and from D to CE. Let E′ be the reflection of E over AD and D′ be the reflection of D over CE. Both D′ and E′ lie on AC, as AD bisects EE′ and CE bisects DD′.

What I found:
∠CED′=18°
∠ADE′=24°
∠DEE′=∠DE′E=90°−24°=66°
∠EDD′=∠ED′D=90°−18°=72°
∠E′ED′=66°−2⋅18°=30°
∠D′DE′=72°−2⋅24°=24°
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Lemoine said:
Let △ABC be a triangle. Let AD and CE be its internal bisectors, with D lying on BC and E lying on AB. Given that ∠CED=18° and ∠ADE=24°, how can I find angles ∠A and ∠C without aid of softwares? Angle ∠B is easy to calculate, as
∠CED+∠ADE=∠CAD+∠ACE=∠A+∠C2=180°−∠B2
42°=180°−∠B2
∠B=96°
The other angles are difficult to calculate. I made this construction on Geogebra and got ∠A=12° and ∠C=72°(exactly), but I'm not being able to find them by geometric constructions.
I agree that this seems difficult. The only way I could get at it was to use trigonometry.
[TIKZ][scale=1.75]
\coordinate [label=above:{$A$}] (A) at (-6,0) ;
\coordinate [label=right:{$B$}] (B) at (0,0) ;
\coordinate [label=right:{$C$}] (C) at (0.5,3) ;
\coordinate [label=below:{$E$}] (E) at (-2,0) ;
\coordinate [label=right:{$D$}] (D) at (0.25,1.5) ;
\draw (A) -- (B) -- (C) -- (A) -- (D) -- (E) -- (C) ;
\node at (-5.1,0.1) {$\alpha$} ;
\node at (-5.1,0.3) {$\alpha$} ;
\node at (0.3,2.5) {$\gamma$} ;
\node at (0,2.6) {$\gamma$} ;
\node at (-0.17,0.15) {$96^\circ$} ;
\node at (-0.3,1.25) {$24^\circ$} ;
\node at (-1.4,0.5) {$18^\circ$} ;
[/TIKZ]
Suppose that the angles at $A$ and $C$ are $2\alpha$ and $2\gamma$. By the sine rule in $\triangle ABD$, $$\frac{BD}{\sin\alpha} = \frac{AB}{\sin(\alpha+96^\circ)}.$$

By the sine rule in $\triangle BEC$, $$\frac{BE}{\sin\gamma} = \frac{BC}{\sin(\gamma+96^\circ)}.$$

Using the sine rule in $\triangle BDE$ and then in $\triangle ABC$, it follows that $$\frac{\sin(\alpha+24^\circ)}{\sin(\gamma+18^\circ)} = \frac{BD}{BE} = \frac{AB\sin\alpha \sin(\gamma+96^\circ)}{BC\sin\gamma \sin(\alpha+96^\circ)} = \frac{\sin(2\gamma)\sin\alpha \sin(\gamma+96^\circ)}{\sin(2\alpha)\sin\gamma \sin(\alpha+96^\circ)} = \frac{\cos\gamma\sin(\gamma+96^\circ)}{\cos\alpha \sin(\alpha+96^\circ)}.$$
Therefore $$\sin(\alpha+24^\circ)\cos\alpha \sin(\alpha+96^\circ) = \sin(\gamma+18^\circ) \cos\gamma\sin(\gamma+96^\circ).$$ Since $\alpha + \gamma = 42^\circ$, we can write this as $$\sin(\alpha+24^\circ)\cos\alpha \sin(\alpha+96^\circ) = \sin(60^\circ - \alpha) \cos(42^\circ - \alpha)\sin(138^\circ - \alpha^\circ).$$ In principle, that equation should determine $\alpha$. In practice, it is not so easy. I found that by messing about with sum-to-product trig formulas, I could reduce it to $$\tan\alpha = \frac{2\cos66^\circ - \sin48^\circ}{\cos48^\circ}.$$ To make progress from there, I had to use the geometry of the regular pentagon.

[TIKZ][scale=0.75]
\coordinate [label=above: $C$] (C) at (90:5cm) ;
\coordinate [label=above right: $D$] (D) at (18:5cm) ;
\coordinate [label=above left: $B$] (B) at (162:5cm) ;
\coordinate [label=below: $A$] (A) at (234:5cm) ;
\coordinate [label=below: $E$] (E) at (306:5cm) ;
\coordinate [label=below: $P$] (P) at (-4.755,-4.045) ;
\coordinate [label=above right: $N$] (N) at (0,-4.045) ;
\draw (A) -- node
{$1$} (B) -- node[above left] {$1$} (C) -- node[above right] {$1$} (D) -- node
{$1$} (E) -- node[below] {$1$} (A) -- (P) -- (B) -- (D) ;
\draw (C) -- (N) ;
\draw (0.3,1.25) node {$K$} ;
\draw (-3.4,-3.75) node {$72^\circ$} ;
\draw (-0.35,4.3) node {$54^\circ$} ;
\draw (0.4,4.3) node {$54^\circ$} ;
[/TIKZ]

In that diagram, $CN$ and $BP$ are perpendicular to $AE$. If the sides of the pentagon have unit length then $AN = \frac12$. But $AN = BK - PA = \sin54^\circ - \cos72^\circ$. So $$\sin54^\circ - \cos72^\circ = \tfrac12,$$ $$\sin(48^\circ + 6^\circ) = \cos72^\circ + \cos60^\circ = 2\cos6^\circ \cos66^\circ,$$ $$\sin48^\circ\cos6^\circ + \cos48^\circ\sin6^\circ = 2\cos6^\circ \cos66^\circ,$$ $$\cos48^\circ\sin6^\circ = \cos6^\circ(2\cos66^\circ - \sin48^\circ),$$ $$\tan6^\circ = \frac{2\cos66^\circ - \sin48^\circ}{\cos48^\circ}.$$ Therefore $\tan\alpha = \tan6^\circ$, so that $\angle A = 12^\circ$ and $\angle C = 72^\circ$, as forecast by Geogebra.​
 
Last edited:
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top