Find a function so that the composition is continuous

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the continuity of a piecewise function defined on the real numbers and the exploration of whether there exist continuous functions that can be composed with this function to yield a continuous result. The focus is on the conditions for continuity at specific points and the implications of function composition.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Participants analyze the continuity of the function defined piecewise and derive conditions for the constants \(a\), \(b\), and \(c\) to ensure continuity at points \(x=1\) and \(x=2\).
  • Some participants propose that for \(f\) to be continuous at \(x=1\), it must hold that \(a=3\), and for continuity at \(x=2\), \(b=-2\) and \(c=-\frac{1}{2}\).
  • There is a discussion about the continuity of compositions \(f \circ g\) and \(g \circ f\), with participants questioning what properties \(g\) must have for these compositions to be continuous.
  • Some participants suggest that if \(g\) is a constant function, then \(g \circ f\) would also be continuous, while others challenge this by noting that \(f\) itself is not continuous at \(x=1\).
  • Participants explore the implications of continuity definitions and limits, particularly at the transition points of the piecewise function.
  • There is a proposal that a function \(g\) could be defined such that \(g(0) = g(2)\) to satisfy continuity conditions derived from limits.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about whether a constant function can indeed yield a continuous composition with \(f\) due to the discontinuities in \(f\).
  • Discussion includes the evaluation of limits involving \(g\) and the piecewise function \(f\) to determine necessary conditions for continuity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need to analyze the continuity of the function at specific points and the implications for function composition. However, there is disagreement regarding the effectiveness of using constant functions for \(g\) and whether such functions can lead to continuous compositions given the discontinuities in \(f\).

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the continuity of \(f\) at certain points is dependent on the values of \(a\), \(b\), and \(c\), and that the discussion remains open regarding the existence of continuous functions \(g\) that can be composed with \(f\) to yield continuity across \(\mathbb{R}\).

mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

For which real constants $a,b,c$ is the following function $f$ continuous on $\mathbb{R}$ ?
$$f(x)=\begin{cases}1+x^2 & \text{ for } x\leq 1, \\ ax-x^3 & \text{ for } 1<x< 2 \\ b & \text{ for } x=2\\ cx^2 & \text{ for } x>2\end{cases}$$
For $a=1, b=-6, c=-\frac{3}{2}$ the function $f$ is discontinuous at $x_0=1$. Are there continuous functions $g:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$, such that $f\circ g$ or $g\circ f$ is continuous on whole $\mathbb{R}$ ?

We have to check the continuity at the points $x=1$ and $x=2$.

We consider the point $x=1$:

We have that $\lim_{x\rightarrow 1^-}f(x)=\lim_{x\rightarrow 1^-}(1+x^2)=2$, $\lim_{x\rightarrow 1^+}f(x)=\lim_{x\rightarrow 1^+}(ax-x^3)=a-1$ and $f(1)=1+1^2=2$.

So that the function is continuous at $x=1$ it must hold $a-1=2\Rightarrow a=3$.

We consider the point $x=2$:

We have that $\lim_{x\rightarrow 2^-}f(x)\overset{ a=3 }{ = } \lim_{x\rightarrow 2^-}(3x-x^3)=6-8=-2$, $\lim_{x\rightarrow 2^+}f(x)=\lim_{x\rightarrow 2^+}(cx^2)=4c$ and $f(2)=b$.

So that the function is continuous at $x=2$ it must hold $-2=4c=b$. So we get $b=-2$ and $c=-\frac{1}{2}$.

Is everything correct?

For $a=1, b=-6, c=-\frac{3}{2}$ we get the function $$f(x)=\begin{cases}1+x^2 & \text{ for } x\leq 1, \\ x-x^3 & \text{ for } 1<x< 2 \\ -6 & \text{ for } x=2\\ -\frac{3}{2}x^2 & \text{ for } x>2\end{cases}$$

How can we find (or check if there exist) continuous functions $g$ such that $f\circ g$ or $g\circ f$ is continuous on whole $\mathbb{R}$ ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mathmari said:
Is everything correct?

Hey mathmari! (Smile)

Yep. (Nod)

mathmari said:
For $a=1, b=-6, c=-\frac{3}{2}$ we get the function $$f(x)=\begin{cases}1+x^2 & \text{ for } x\leq 1, \\ x-x^3 & \text{ for } 1<x< 2 \\ -6 & \text{ for } x=2\\ -\frac{3}{2}x^2 & \text{ for } x>2\end{cases}$$

How can we find (or check if there exist) continuous functions $g$ such that $f\circ g$ or $g\circ f$ is continuous on whole $\mathbb{R}$ ?

What do we get if we apply the definition of continuity to $g\circ f$ for some unknown function $g$? (Wondering)
 
I like Serena said:
What do we get if we apply the definition of continuity to $g\circ f$ for some unknown function $g$? (Wondering)

Let $a$ be an arbitrary point.

We want that $f(g(x))$ is continuous at each $a$, so $f$ is continuous at each $g(a)$.

We know that $g$ is a continuos function. So it will be continuous at each $a$.
That means that for all $\epsilon>0$ there is some $\delta>0$ such that $$|x-a|<\delta \Rightarrow|g(x)-g(a)|<\epsilon$$

Since $f$ is continuous at $g(a)$ we have that for all $\tilde{\epsilon} > 0$ there is some $\tilde{\delta}$ such that $$|g(x) - g(a)| < \tilde{\delta} \Rightarrow |f(g(x))-f(g(a))|<\tilde{\epsilon}$$

For $\epsilon=\tilde{\delta}$ we have the following:

For all $\epsilon > 0$ there is some $\delta > 0$ and a $\tilde{\delta}> 0$ such that $$|x-a| < \delta\Rightarrow |g(x)-g(a)|<\tilde{\delta}\Rightarrow |f(g(x)) - f(g(a))|<\epsilon$$
right? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
Let $a$ be an arbitrary point.

We want that $f(g(x))$ is continuous at each $a$, so $f$ is continuous at each $g(a)$.

We know that $g$ is a continuos function. So it will be continuous at each $a$.
That means that for all $\epsilon>0$ there is some $\delta>0$ such that $$|x-a|<\delta \Rightarrow|g(x)-g(a)|<\epsilon$$

Since $f$ is continuous at $g(a)$ we have that for all $\tilde{\epsilon} > 0$ there is some $\tilde{\delta}$ such that $$|g(x) - g(a)| < \tilde{\delta} \Rightarrow |f(g(x))-f(g(a))|<\tilde{\epsilon}$$

For $\epsilon=\tilde{\delta}$ we have the following:

For all $\epsilon > 0$ there is some $\delta > 0$ and a $\tilde{\delta}> 0$ such that $$|x-a| < \delta\Rightarrow |g(x)-g(a)|<\tilde{\delta}\Rightarrow |f(g(x)) - f(g(a))|<\epsilon$$
right? (Wondering)

Let's not jump to $\epsilon$-$\delta$ definitions of limits. (Worried)What we need for continuity of $g\circ f$ is that $\lim_{x\to x_0} g(f(x)) = g(f(x_0))$.
More specifically in our case that means that:
$$\lim_{x\to 1^+} g(f(x)) = \lim_{x\to 1^-} g(f(x)) = g(f(1))$$
What do we require from $g$ for that to be true? (Wondering)
 
I like Serena said:
What we need for continuity of $g\circ f$ is that $\lim_{x\to x_0} g(f(x)) = g(f(x_0))$.
More specifically in our case that means that:
$$\lim_{x\to 1^+} g(f(x)) = \lim_{x\to 1^-} g(f(x)) = g(f(1))$$
What do we require from $g$ for that to be true? (Wondering)

$g$ has to continuous at $f(1)=2$, right? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
$g$ has to continuous at $f(1)=2$, right? (Wondering)

Not quite, since f is not continuous at 1. (Thinking)
 
I like Serena said:
Not quite, since f is not continuous at 1. (Thinking)

Do we maybe take as $g$ a constant function? Then we would have that $g(x)=C$ and $g(f(x))=C$, which is continuous everywhere? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
Do we maybe take as $g$ a constant function? Then we would have that $g(x)=C$ and $g(f(x))=C$, which is continuous everywhere? (Wondering)

But $f$ is not continuous is it?
So if $g$ is a constant function, $g\circ f$ won't be continuous either would it?

Suppose we substitute the relevant parts of $f$ into the limit expression... (Thinking)
 
I like Serena said:
Suppose we substitute the relevant parts of $f$ into the limit expression... (Thinking)

Do you mean the following?

$$\lim_{x\to 1^+} g(f(x)) =\lim_{x\to 1^+} g(x-x^3) \\ \lim_{x\to 1^-} g(f(x)) = \lim_{x\to 1^-} g(1+x^2) $$

So, it must hold that $$\lim_{x\to 1^+} g(x-x^3)= \lim_{x\to 1^-} g(1+x^2)$$ right? (Wondering)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
Indeed. And since g is continuous, we can evaluate those limits, can't we? (Wondering)
 
  • #11
I like Serena said:
Indeed. And since g is continuous, we can evaluate those limits, can't we? (Wondering)

Ah yes. So, we get $$\lim_{x\to 1^+} g(x-x^3)= \lim_{x\to 1^-} g(1+x^2)\Rightarrow g\left (\lim_{x\to 1^+}(x-x^3)\right )= g\left (\lim_{x\to 1^-} (1+x^2)\right )\Rightarrow g(0 )= g(2)$$ right?

Such a function is for example $g(x)=x\cdot (x-2)$, isn't it?

(Wondering)
 
  • #12
mathmari said:
Ah yes. So, we get $$\lim_{x\to 1^+} g(x-x^3)= \lim_{x\to 1^-} g(1+x^2)\Rightarrow g\left (\lim_{x\to 1^+}(x-x^3)\right )= g\left (\lim_{x\to 1^-} (1+x^2)\right )\Rightarrow g(0 )= g(2)$$ right?

Such a function is for example $g(x)=x\cdot (x-2)$, isn't it?

Yep.

And I'm just realizing that I was wrong before. If $g$ is a constant function, $g\circ f$ will also be a constant function and therefore continuous. (Blush)
 
  • #13
I like Serena said:
Yep.

And I'm just realizing that I was wrong before. If $g$ is a constant function, $g\circ f$ will also be a constant function and therefore continuous. (Blush)

Ah ok!

If $g$ is a constant, $g(x)=C$. then we have that $g(f(x))=C$ and a constant function is everywhere continuous, right?

Is it possible that $f\circ g$ is continuous for some function $g$ ?

Can we take here also a constanst function? When $g(x)=C$ then we have that $f\circ g(x)=f(g(x))=f(C)$, which is also constant, right?

(Wondering)
 
  • #14
Yep.
 
  • #15
But can $C$ be also $1$ ?

Then we would have $f\circ g(x)=f(g(x))=f(1)=2$, or isn't $f(1)=2$ ? (Wondering)
 
  • #16
Sure. That's all correct. (Nod)
 
  • #17
mathmari said:
Do you mean the following?

$$\lim_{x\to 1^+} g(f(x)) =\lim_{x\to 1^+} g(x-x^3) \\ \lim_{x\to 1^-} g(f(x)) = \lim_{x\to 1^-} g(1+x^2) $$

So, it must hold that $$\lim_{x\to 1^+} g(x-x^3)= \lim_{x\to 1^-} g(1+x^2)$$ right? (Wondering)

mathmari said:
Ah yes. So, we get $$\lim_{x\to 1^+} g(x-x^3)= \lim_{x\to 1^-} g(1+x^2)\Rightarrow g\left (\lim_{x\to 1^+}(x-x^3)\right )= g\left (\lim_{x\to 1^-} (1+x^2)\right )\Rightarrow g(0 )= g(2)$$ right?

Such a function is for example $g(x)=x\cdot (x-2)$, isn't it?

(Wondering)

Could we do that also for $f\circ g$ ?

$$\lim_{x\to 1^+} f(g(x)) =\lim_{x\to 1^+} (g(x)-g^3(x))=g(1)-g^3(1) \\ \lim_{x\to 1^-} g(f(x)) = \lim_{x\to 1^-} (1+g^2(x))=1+g^2(1)$$

So we have to find a function $g$ such that $g(1)-g^3(1)=1+g^2(1)$.

Which function could that be? (Wondering)
 
  • #18
mathmari said:
Could we do that also for $f\circ g$ ?

$$\lim_{x\to 1^+} f(g(x)) =\lim_{x\to 1^+} (g(x)-g^3(x))=g(1)-g^3(1) \\ \lim_{x\to 1^-} g(f(x)) = \lim_{x\to 1^-} (1+g^2(x))=1+g^2(1)$$

So we have to find a function $g$ such that $g(1)-g^3(1)=1+g^2(1)$.

Which function could that be? (Wondering)

I'm afraid that for $f\circ g$ it's a little more complicated.
In this case it's not $x$ that has to approach $1^+$, but $g(x)$. (Worried)

Suppose that there is some $x_0$ such that $g(x_0)=1$ and $g$ is increasing in $x_0$.

Then
$$\lim_{{x\to x_0}^+} f(g(x)) = \lim_{y\to 1^+} f(y) =\lim_{y\to 1^+} (y-y^3)=0 \\
\lim_{{x\to x_0}^-} f(g(x)) = \lim_{y\to 1^-} f(y) =\lim_{y\to 1^-} (1+y^2)=2
$$
That meanst that $f\circ g$ would not be continuous in $x_0$ then.

So $g$ can't have a function value of $1$ where $g$ is monotone as well.
However, $g$ might still have a function value of $1$ if it is a (global) extreme. (Thinking)
 
  • #19
I like Serena said:
I'm afraid that for $f\circ g$ it's a little more complicated.
In this case it's not $x$ that has to approach $1^+$, but $g(x)$. (Worried)

Suppose that there is some $x_0$ such that $g(x_0)=1$ and $g$ is increasing in $x_0$.

Then
$$\lim_{{x\to x_0}^+} f(g(x)) = \lim_{y\to 1^+} f(y) =\lim_{y\to 1^+} (y-y^3)=0 \\
\lim_{{x\to x_0}^-} f(g(x)) = \lim_{y\to 1^-} f(y) =\lim_{y\to 1^+} (1+y^2)=2
$$
That meanst that $f\circ g$ would not be continuous in $x_0$ then.
So, is $f\circ g$ continuous only when $g$ is a constant function? (Wondering)
 
  • #20
mathmari said:
So, is $f\circ g$ continuous only when $g$ is a constant function?

$f$ has jump discontinuities in $1$ and $2$.
That means that $g$ cannot 'cross' those values.
But for instance $g(x)= 3 + x^2$ will work.
And $g(x)= 2 + x^2$ will also work since $\lim_{x\to 2^+} f(x) = f(2)$. (Thinking)
 
  • #21
I like Serena said:
$f$ has jump discontinuities in $1$ and $2$.
That means that $g$ cannot 'cross' those values.
But for instance $g(x)= 3 + x^2$ will work.
And $g(x)= 2 + x^2$ will also work since $\lim_{x\to 2^+} f(x) = f(2)$. (Thinking)

Ah I see! Thank you so much! (Yes)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K