MHB Find an equation of the line that is perpendicular to x - y + 2 = 0

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To find the equation of a line perpendicular to x - y + 2 = 0 and passing through (3,1), the slope of the original equation is determined to be 1, making the perpendicular slope -1. The point-slope formula is then used with the point (3,1) and the slope -1, resulting in the equation y = -x + 4. This can be rearranged into standard form, yielding x + y - 4 = 0. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using the correct forms and methods for deriving the equations.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Find an equation of the line that is perpendicular to x - y + 2 = 0 and passes through the point (3,1). Write your answer in two forms: y = mx + b and Ax + By + C = 0.

The equation we want is perpendicular to the given equation. This means the slope must be the negative reciprocal of the slope of the given equation.

True?

Steps:

1. Solve the given equation for y.

2. Find the negative reciprocal slope of the equation in step 1.

3. Plug the slope from step 2 and the point (3,1) into the point-slope formula and solve for y.

4. Express the equation in the form Ax + By + C = 0

Correct?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
For step 3, don't you mean "solve for b" instead of "solve for y"? (Wondering)

Other than that detail, I am in agreement with what you have posted. :)
 
greg1313 said:
For step 3, don't you mean "solve for b" instead of "solve for y"? (Wondering)

Other than that detail, I am in agreement with what you have posted. :)

Why solve for b in step 3? The slope m is required for the needed equation not the y-intercept or b.
 
Sorry; I mistook "point-slope" for "slope-intercept". At any rate, I don't see why you'd use point-slope when slope-intercept and standard form are required. Also, slope-intercept seems easier to work with.
 
Cool.
 
Steps:

1. Solve the given equation for y.

x - y + 2 = 0

x - y = - 2

- y = - x - 2

y = (- x - 2)/(-1)

y = x + 2

2. Find the negative reciprocal slope of the equation in step 1.

The negative reciprocal of 1 is - 1. This is our slope.

3. Plug the slope from step 2 and the point (3,1) into the point-slope formula and solve for y.

y - 1 = -(x - 3)

y - 1 = - x + 3

y = - x + 3 + 1

y = - x + 4

4. Express the equation in the form Ax + By + C = 0.

x + y - 4 = 0
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top