MHB Find an equation of the line that is perpendicular to x - y + 2 = 0

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To find the equation of a line perpendicular to x - y + 2 = 0 and passing through (3,1), the slope of the original equation is determined to be 1, making the perpendicular slope -1. The point-slope formula is then used with the point (3,1) and the slope -1, resulting in the equation y = -x + 4. This can be rearranged into standard form, yielding x + y - 4 = 0. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using the correct forms and methods for deriving the equations.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Find an equation of the line that is perpendicular to x - y + 2 = 0 and passes through the point (3,1). Write your answer in two forms: y = mx + b and Ax + By + C = 0.

The equation we want is perpendicular to the given equation. This means the slope must be the negative reciprocal of the slope of the given equation.

True?

Steps:

1. Solve the given equation for y.

2. Find the negative reciprocal slope of the equation in step 1.

3. Plug the slope from step 2 and the point (3,1) into the point-slope formula and solve for y.

4. Express the equation in the form Ax + By + C = 0

Correct?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
For step 3, don't you mean "solve for b" instead of "solve for y"? (Wondering)

Other than that detail, I am in agreement with what you have posted. :)
 
greg1313 said:
For step 3, don't you mean "solve for b" instead of "solve for y"? (Wondering)

Other than that detail, I am in agreement with what you have posted. :)

Why solve for b in step 3? The slope m is required for the needed equation not the y-intercept or b.
 
Sorry; I mistook "point-slope" for "slope-intercept". At any rate, I don't see why you'd use point-slope when slope-intercept and standard form are required. Also, slope-intercept seems easier to work with.
 
Cool.
 
Steps:

1. Solve the given equation for y.

x - y + 2 = 0

x - y = - 2

- y = - x - 2

y = (- x - 2)/(-1)

y = x + 2

2. Find the negative reciprocal slope of the equation in step 1.

The negative reciprocal of 1 is - 1. This is our slope.

3. Plug the slope from step 2 and the point (3,1) into the point-slope formula and solve for y.

y - 1 = -(x - 3)

y - 1 = - x + 3

y = - x + 3 + 1

y = - x + 4

4. Express the equation in the form Ax + By + C = 0.

x + y - 4 = 0
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top