MHB Find area of a triangle in coordinate plane

AI Thread Summary
To find the area of triangle QRS in the coordinate plane, the area of the surrounding rectangle is calculated first, yielding 20. The areas of three right triangles within the rectangle, which are not part of triangle QRS, are then determined to be 6, 2, and 5, totaling 13. By subtracting this total from the rectangle's area, the area of triangle QRS is found to be 7. It is noted that triangle QRS is not a right triangle, as it does not satisfy the Pythagorean Theorem. The discussion concludes with the confirmation that the area of triangle QRS is indeed 7.
funnijen
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Attachments

  • IMG_8161-2.JPG
    IMG_8161-2.JPG
    28.3 KB · Views: 117
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello, and welcome to MHB! (Wave)

$$\triangle QRS$$ is not a right triangle, but I suspect what is intended is for you to find the area of the rectangle, and then subtract away the areas of the 3 right triangles that are within the rectangle, but not part of $$\triangle QRS$$.

Can you proceed?
 
Um does the position on the grid mean anything. i honestly only know 1/2BH formula and its not giving me the right answer. I honestly don't know any part of how to do this
 
I figured it out! 7 is the answer. Thanks!
 
Very good! For those who are interested, MarkFL could see that the central triangle was NOT a right triangle because it does not satisfy the "Pythagorean Theorem". The two legs have length 5 and 2\sqrt{2} while the hypotenuse has length $\sqrt{29}$. $29\ne 25+ 8$.

The bounding 4 by 5 rectangle has area 20. The right triangle at the upper left corner has area 3(4)/2= 6. The right triangle at the lower left has area 2(2)/2= 2. And the right triangle at the right has area 2(5)/2= 5. Those have total area 6+ 2+ 5=13 so the area of the central triangle is 20- 13= 7 as funnigen said.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top