Find Christoffel symbols from metric

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the non-zero Christoffel symbols from a given metric in the context of general relativity. The metric in question is expressed in terms of time and spatial coordinates, with a specific focus on the case when a parameter k equals zero.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to use the Lagrangian method to derive the Christoffel symbols but expresses uncertainty about their correctness. They compare their results to the expected Ricci tensor components and question whether they have overlooked any non-zero symbols.
  • Some participants suggest using a standard formula for calculating Christoffel symbols as a verification method, while others note the complexity of the problem due to the four-dimensional metric.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively exploring different methods for calculating the Christoffel symbols. While some guidance has been offered regarding the standard formula, there is no explicit consensus on the correctness of the approaches taken so far. The discussion remains open as participants share their calculations and seek clarification.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes the challenge of working with a four-dimensional metric, which leads to a large number of potential Christoffel symbols. They also mention the time constraints affecting their ability to verify calculations thoroughly.

ck99
Messages
56
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the non zero Christoffel symbols of the following metric

ds^2 = -dt^2 + \frac{a(t)^2}{(1+\frac{k}{4}(x^2+y^2+z^2))^2} (dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2 )

and find the non zero Christoffel symbols and Ricci tensor coefficients when k = 0

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I have tried to use the Lagrangian method here, but it's so long since I was taught this I'm not sure if I'm even half right!

Starting with

\frac{d}{dλ} \frac{∂L}{∂\dot{q}} = \frac{∂L}{∂q}

and for the case where q = t, so q' = t', I get

\frac{∂L}{∂q} = 0 + \frac{2a\dot{a}}{(1+\frac{k}{4}(x^2+y^2+z^2))^2} (\dot{x}^2 + \dot{y}^2 + \dot{z}^2)

\frac{∂L}{∂\dot{q}} = -2\dot{t}

\frac{d}{dλ} \frac{∂L}{∂\dot{q}} = -2\ddot{t}

Putting it all together, I get

-2\ddot{t} = \frac{2a\dot{a}}{(1+\frac{k}{4}(x^2+y^2+z^2))^2} (\dot{x}^2 + \dot{y}^2 + \dot{z}^2)

or just

\ddot{t} + \frac{a\dot{a}}{(1+\frac{k}{4}(x^2+y^2+z^2))^2} (\dot{x}^2 + \dot{y}^2 + \dot{z}^2) = 0

Compare this to

\ddot{X}^a + \Gamma^a_bc \dot{X}^a \dot{X}^b

to get

\Gamma^0_11 = \Gamma^0_22 = \Gamma^0_33 = \frac{a\dot{a}}{(1+\frac{k}{4}(x^2+y^2+z^2))^2}

This all looks OK to me, but I have worked through the rest of the problem using this approach and when I have to calculate Ricci tensor components I can't get the correct answers. I thought I should start by checking my work at the very beginning!

When k = 0 and the metric is much simplified, I get the following non-zero Christoffel symbols by using this approach

\Gamma^0_11 = \Gamma^0_22 = \Gamma^0_33 = a\dot{a}

\Gamma^1_11 = \Gamma^2_22 = \Gamma^3_33 = 2\frac{\dot{a}}{a}

and it's at this point that I get the Ricci tensor components all wrong (I know what they should be and I can't get the same answers). Is my Lagrangian method wrong, and have I missed out a load of non-zero Christoffel symbols?

(I didn't want to write out all my other Lagrangian working because this is my first go with LATEX and writing this post has taken me over an hour!)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I hope that someone will have time to go through your calculation, as unfortunately I don't at the moment. But maybe you will already be helped if I point out that
\Gamma_{cab}<br /> =\frac12 \left(\frac{\partial g_{ca}}{\partial x^b} + \frac{\partial g_{cb}}{\partial x^a} - \frac{\partial g_{ab}}{\partial x^c} \right)<br /> = \frac12\, (g_{ca, b} + g_{cb, a} - g_{ab, c}) <br /> = \frac12\, \left(\partial_{b}g_{ca} + \partial_{a}g_{cb} - \partial_{c}g_{ab}\right) \,.<br />

That's the way I was taught to calculate them.
 
I have also used that method, and am trying to apply it this problem at the moment as "backup". However, because I have a 4D metric I have 40 possible christoffel symbols even allowing for symmetry. I thought the Lagrangian method would be quicker but I obviously haven't applied it correctly...
 
Why don't you use compuchip's standard formula just to spot check some of the coefficients that you calculated with the Lagrangian method? This might also give you a hint as to where you are making your mistake.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K